Emily C. Bianchi

18 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Emily C. Bianchi
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Sociology and Political Science 256
  • Social Psychology 216
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 112
  • Clinical Psychology 62
  • Accounting 57
Replace Ken‐ichi Ohbuchi with:
Ken‐ichi Ohbuchi Japan
Kelly Pledger Weeks United States
Jordan H. Stein United States
David J. Cherrington United States
Julia M. Kensbock Germany
Harris Sondak United States
Rena Rasch United States
Otilia Obodaru United States
Shefali V. Patil United States
Lotte Scholten Netherlands
Emily C. Bianchi relative to Ken‐ichi Ohbuchi Japan Ken‐ichi Ohbuchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Ken‐ichi Ohbuchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily C. Bianchi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily C. Bianchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily C. Bianchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily C. Bianchi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily C. Bianchi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily C. Bianchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily C. Bianchi. The network helps show where Emily C. Bianchi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily C. Bianchi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily C. Bianchi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily C. Bianchi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily C. Bianchi. Emily C. Bianchi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 11
2 10
3 40
4 15
5 41
6 1
7 62
8 46
9 57
10
The effect of racial primes on the test performance of African-American and European-American children
1
11 67
12 1
13 1
14 0
15 28
16 57
17 1
18 48
19 18
20 44

About Emily C. Bianchi

Emily C. Bianchi is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (112 citations), Social Psychology (216 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations). Emily C. Bianchi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen D. Vohs, Joel Brockner, Daniel R. Ames, Sarah Lee, Erika V. Hall, Robb Willer, Stéphane Côté, Jennifer E. Stellar, Sean Martín and Joe C. Magee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Academy of Management Journal and Administrative Science Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026