Annika Scholl

1.2k total citations
33 papers, 767 citations indexed

About

Annika Scholl is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Annika Scholl has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 767 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 18 papers in Social Psychology and 11 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Annika Scholl's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (15 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (9 papers). Annika Scholl is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (15 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (9 papers). Annika Scholl collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Australia. Annika Scholl's co-authors include Kai Sassenberg, Eva J. Mojza, Carmen Binnewies, Sabine Sonnentag, Daan Scheepers, Naomi Ellemers, Frank de Wit, Kai Epstude, Neal J. Roese and Christina Matschke and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Annika Scholl

33 papers receiving 727 citations

Peers

Annika Scholl

SPS

OBHRM

Kenneth Tai Singapore

Vanessa K. Bohns United States

Kristine M. Kelly United States

Michael S. North United States

Jordan M. Robbins United States

Oliver Weigelt Germany

Sonia Ghumman United States

Eduardo Barros Chile

William J. Becker United States

Jennifer R. Overbeck United States

Kenneth Tai Singapore

Annika Scholl

388 ×1.0

355 ×1.0

SPS

284 ×1.2

OBHRM

62 ×0.5

76 ×0.7

Citations per year, relative to Annika Scholl Annika Scholl (= 1×) peers Kenneth Tai

Countries citing papers authored by Annika Scholl

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annika Scholl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annika Scholl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annika Scholl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annika Scholl

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annika Scholl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annika Scholl. The network helps show where Annika Scholl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annika Scholl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annika Scholl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annika Scholl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annika Scholl. Annika Scholl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Sassenberg, Kai, et al.. (2023). Enactive mastery experience improves attitudes towards digital technology via self-efficacy – a pre-registered quasi-experiment. Behaviour and Information Technology. 43(2). 298–311. 11 indexed citations

Scholl, Annika, et al.. (2022). Let’s stay in touch: Frequency (but not mode) of interaction between leaders and followers predicts better leadership outcomes. PLoS ONE. 17(12). e0279176–e0279176. 2 indexed citations

Scholl, Annika & Kai Sassenberg. (2021). How Identification With the Social Environment and With the Government Guide the Use of the Official COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Three Quantitative Survey Studies. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 9(11). e28146–e28146. 6 indexed citations

Scholl, Annika, et al.. (2021). In case of doubt for the speculation? When people falsely remember facts in the news as being uncertain.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 151(4). 852–871. 1 indexed citations

Sassenberg, Kai, et al.. (2021). Introducing digital technologies in the factory: determinants of blue-collar workers’ attitudes towards new robotic tools. Behaviour and Information Technology. 41(14). 2973–2987. 10 indexed citations

Winter, Kevin, Annika Scholl, & Kai Sassenberg. (2020). A matter of flexibility: Changing outgroup attitudes through messages with negations.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 120(4). 956–976. 16 indexed citations

Scholl, Annika, et al.. (2020). Out of sight, out of mind: Power-holders feel responsible when anticipating face-to-face, but not digital contact with others. Computers in Human Behavior. 112. 106472–106472. 7 indexed citations

Scholl, Annika. (2019). Responsible power-holders: when and for what the powerful may assume responsibility. Current Opinion in Psychology. 33. 28–32. 9 indexed citations

Scholl, Annika, Johannes Bloechle, Kai Sassenberg, Stefan Huber, & Korbinian Moeller. (2019). The power to adapt: How sense of power predicts number processing.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 73(3). 157–166. 1 indexed citations

10.

Scholl, Annika, Kai Sassenberg, & Stefan Pfattheicher. (2019). Pressured to be excellent? Social identification prevents negative affect from high university excellence norms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 84. 103796–103796. 10 indexed citations

11.

Scholl, Annika, et al.. (2019). When those who know do share: Group goals facilitate information sharing, but social power does not undermine it. PLoS ONE. 14(3). e0213795–e0213795. 2 indexed citations

12.

Scholl, Annika, Frank de Wit, Naomi Ellemers, et al.. (2018). The Burden of Power: Construing Power as Responsibility (Rather Than as Opportunity) Alters Threat-Challenge Responses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 44(7). 1024–1038. 32 indexed citations

13.

Scholl, Annika, et al.. (2017). Time to go! Leaving the group in response to norm-deviations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 73. 259–267. 18 indexed citations

14.

Epstude, Kai, Annika Scholl, & Neal J. Roese. (2016). Prefactual Thoughts: Mental Simulations about What Might Happen. Review of General Psychology. 20(1). 48–56. 38 indexed citations

15.

Scholl, Annika, Korbinian Moeller, Daan Scheepers, Hans‐Christoph Nuerk, & Kai Sassenberg. (2015). Physiological threat responses predict number processing. Psychological Research. 81(1). 278–288. 12 indexed citations

16.

Scholl, Annika, Claudia Sassenrath, & Kai Sassenberg. (2015). Attracted to power: challenge/threat and promotion/prevention focus differentially predict the attractiveness of group power. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 397–397. 8 indexed citations

17.

Scholl, Annika & Kai Sassenberg. (2014). “While You Still Think, I Already Type”: Experienced Social Power Reduces Deliberation During E-Mail Communication. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 17(11). 692–696. 3 indexed citations

18.

Scholl, Annika & Kai Sassenberg. (2014). Better Know When (Not) to Think Twice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 41(2). 159–170. 32 indexed citations

19.

Scholl, Annika & Kai Sassenberg. (2014). Where could we stand if I had…? How social power impacts counterfactual thinking after failure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 53. 51–61. 36 indexed citations

20.

Sonnentag, Sabine, Eva J. Mojza, Carmen Binnewies, & Annika Scholl. (2008). Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement, psychological detachment, and affect. Work & Stress. 22(3). 257–276. 262 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact