Administrative Science Quarterly

3.3k papers and 663.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.3k papers published in Administrative Science Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 663.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Administrative Science Quarterly usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (558 papers), Strategy and Management (462 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (426 papers) specifically the topics of Management and Organizational Studies (366 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (204 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (193 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Administrative Science Quarterly are Geert Hofstede, Daniel A. Levinthal, Wesley M. Cohen, Karl E. Weick, Jeffrey Pfeffer, Robert Karasek, Barry M. Staw, Brian Uzzi, Arndt Sorge and Amy C. Edmondson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Administrative Science Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Administrative Science Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Administrative Science Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Administrative Science Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Administrative Science Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Administrative Science Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Administrative Science Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025