Nenagh Kemp

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
66 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Nenagh Kemp is a scholar working on Education, Human-Computer Interaction and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nenagh Kemp has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Education, 21 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 15 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nenagh Kemp's work include Digital Communication and Language (21 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (12 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (12 papers). Nenagh Kemp is often cited by papers focused on Digital Communication and Language (21 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (12 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (12 papers). Nenagh Kemp collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Nenagh Kemp's co-authors include Rachel Grieve, Peter Bryant, Rauno Parrila, Clare Wood, John R. Kirby, Kimberley Norris, Loene M. Howes, F Martin, Roberta Julian and Sally F. Kelty and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Child Development and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Nenagh Kemp

60 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning

2014 255 citations Nenagh Kemp, Rachel Grieve Frontiers in Psychology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nenagh Kemp Australia	20	610	398	349	232	147	66	1.3k
Brandi N. Frisby United States	23	884 1.4×	138 0.3×	60 0.2×	415 1.8×	107 0.7×	74	1.7k
Regina Jucks Germany	20	288 0.5×	269 0.7×	61 0.2×	457 2.0×	88 0.6×	78	1.2k
Jill Scevak Australia	16	612 1.0×	262 0.7×	129 0.4×	109 0.5×	29 0.2×	38	1.1k
Kieron Sheehy United Kingdom	21	829 1.4×	444 1.1×	66 0.2×	327 1.4×	24 0.2×	92	1.5k
Christa S. C. Asterhan Israel	24	1.2k 1.9×	978 2.5×	33 0.1×	333 1.4×	79 0.5×	65	1.9k
Rosie Flewitt United Kingdom	19	990 1.6×	173 0.4×	54 0.2×	505 2.2×	108 0.7×	46	1.5k
Matthew T. McCrudden United States	22	694 1.1×	1.0k 2.6×	38 0.1×	195 0.8×	45 0.3×	56	1.6k
Janneke van de Pol Netherlands	16	1.2k 1.9×	980 2.5×	30 0.1×	118 0.5×	212 1.4×	40	2.0k
Matthias Nückles Germany	28	1.3k 2.1×	1.5k 3.7×	41 0.1×	167 0.7×	100 0.7×	99	2.5k
Helena Rasku‐Puttonen Finland	26	1.7k 2.9×	813 2.0×	33 0.1×	176 0.8×	95 0.6×	70	2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Nenagh Kemp

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nenagh Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nenagh Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nenagh Kemp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nenagh Kemp

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nenagh Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nenagh Kemp. The network helps show where Nenagh Kemp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nenagh Kemp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nenagh Kemp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nenagh Kemp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nenagh Kemp. Nenagh Kemp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kemp, Nenagh, et al.. (2025). Examining three primary school curricula for their ability to promote health literacy development. Curriculum Perspectives. 45(2). 239–251.

Palmer, Matthew A., et al.. (2025). Capital Gains: Effects of Word Class and Sentence Position on Capitalization Use Across Age. Child Development. 96(6). 2233–2246.

Cruickshank, D.G.M., Shandell Elmer, Dabney P. Evans, et al.. (2025). HealthLit4Kids: Improving health literacy outcomes in an Australian setting. Public Health. 249. 106031–106031.

Cruickshank, Vaughan, et al.. (2024). Community voices in health literacy: a qualitative exploration into perceptions of a health literacy mediator. Health Promotion International. 39(5). 2 indexed citations

Cruickshank, Vaughan, et al.. (2024). Assessing children’s health literacy using a curricular approach: Tasmanian primary school teacher perspectives. 17(1). 16–31. 1 indexed citations

Kemp, Nenagh, et al.. (2024). Assessing children’s health literacy: A curricular approach. Health Education Journal. 83(5). 467–480. 6 indexed citations

Kemp, Nenagh, et al.. (2024). Emojis and affective priming in visual word recognition. Cognition & Emotion. 39(7). 1594–1608. 2 indexed citations

Kemp, Nenagh, et al.. (2024). Examining the relationship between demographic variables and perceived health literacy challenges in Tasmania, Australia. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 36(1). e905–e905. 1 indexed citations

Hogden, Anne, et al.. (2023). Public health agencies’ use of social media for communication during pandemics: a scoping review of the literature. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives. 14(4). 235–251. 1 indexed citations

10.

Kemp, Nenagh, et al.. (2022). Supporting children's health literacy development: A systematised review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Research. 115. 102046–102046. 8 indexed citations

11.

Kemp, Nenagh, et al.. (2022). The imperative to develop health literacy: An ethical evaluation of HealthLit4Kids. Journal of Child Health Care. 27(2). 253–265. 4 indexed citations

12.

Kemp, Nenagh. (2020). University students’ perceived effort and learning in face-to-face and online classes. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching. 3(Special Issue). 15 indexed citations

13.

Norris, Kimberley, et al.. (2019). Parent and teacher reporting of executive function and behavioral difficulties in preterm and term children at kindergarten. Applied Neuropsychology Child. 9(2). 153–164. 10 indexed citations

14.

Norris, Kimberley, et al.. (2018). Examining the relationship between performance-based and questionnaire assessments of executive function in young preterm children: Implications for clinical practice. Child Neuropsychology. 25(7). 899–913. 19 indexed citations

15.

Grieve, Rachel, Nenagh Kemp, Kimberley Norris, & Christine Padgett. (2017). Push or pull? Unpacking the social compensation hypothesis of Internet use in an educational context. Computers & Education. 109. 1–10. 25 indexed citations

16.

Kidd, Evan, et al.. (2016). Language, Culture, and Group Membership. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 47(5). 713–733. 9 indexed citations

17.

Kemp, Nenagh & Rachel Grieve. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 1278–1278. 255 indexed citations breakdown →

18.

Howes, Loene M., K. Paul Kirkbride, Sally F. Kelty, Roberta Julian, & Nenagh Kemp. (2014). The readability of expert reports for non-scientist report-users: Reports of forensic comparison of glass. Forensic Science International. 236. 54–66. 20 indexed citations

19.

Howes, Loene M., K. Paul Kirkbride, Sally F. Kelty, Roberta Julian, & Nenagh Kemp. (2013). Forensic scientists’ conclusions: How readable are they for non-scientist report-users?. Forensic Science International. 231(1-3). 102–112. 28 indexed citations

20.

Kemp, Nenagh, et al.. (2011). Text-Messaging Practices and Links to General Spelling Skill: A Study of Australian Children.. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 11. 27–38. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact