Anne Hogden

61 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Anne Hogden
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Health Information Management 155
  • Pharmacy 127
  • Neurology 350
  • Emergency Medical Services 134
  • General Health Professions 410
Replace Jesia G. Berry with:
Jesia G. Berry Australia
Wendy Baird United Kingdom
Virginia Mumford Australia
Judith Carrier United Kingdom
Stella Reiter-Theil Switzerland
Suzanne Denieffe Ireland
Neda Mehrdad Iran
Megan Hamm United States
Michael D. Warren United Kingdom
Carole Kenner United States
Anne Hogden relative to Jesia G. Berry Australia Jesia G. Berry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
Jesia G. Berry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Hogden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Hogden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Hogden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Hogden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Hogden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Hogden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Hogden. The network helps show where Anne Hogden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Hogden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Hogden Line = papers co-authored together Anne Hogden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017193
2 2017107
3 202169
4 201265
5 201354
6 201644
7 201243
8 201334
9 201431
10 201427
11 201526
12 202024
13 201824
14 201922
15 202022
16 202222
17 202221
18
Safety culture assessment in health care: a review of the literature on safety culture assessment modes
201720
19 201820
20 201918

About Anne Hogden

Anne Hogden is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Neurology, Health Information Management and Clinical Psychology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (17 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (13 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (13 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (12 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (9 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (7 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (7 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (155 citations), Pharmacy (127 citations), Neurology (350 citations), Emergency Medical Services (134 citations) and General Health Professions (410 citations). Anne Hogden has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey Braithwaite, David Greenfield, Matthew C. Kiernan, Kate Churruca, Frances Rapport, Patti Shih, Robyn Clay‐Williams, David Greenfield, Samar Aoun and Natalie James. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, International Journal of Integrated Care, Patient Preference and Adherence and Health Expectations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact