Neil H. Schwartz

977 citations
43 papers · 632 indexed · h-index 14

Neil H. Schwartz

42 papers receiving 537 citations

Peers

Neil H. Schwartz
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 316
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 194
  • Geography, Planning and Development 69
  • Automotive Engineering 118
  • Education 269
Replace Jamie Jirout with:
Jamie Jirout United States
Susan L. Golbeck United States
Benjamin D. Jee United States
Neville Schofield Australia
Minna Kyttälä Finland
Stacy B. Ehrlich United States
Raedy M. Ping United States
Joanna Cannon United Kingdom
Delinda van Garderen United States
Laura J. Massa United States
Neil H. Schwartz relative to Jamie Jirout United States Jamie Jirout's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Jamie Jirout · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil H. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil H. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil H. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil H. Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil H. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil H. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil H. Schwartz. The network helps show where Neil H. Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil H. Schwartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil H. Schwartz Line = papers co-authored together Neil H. Schwartz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20214
2 20205
3 20201
4 20181
5 20144
6 20149
7
11. Knowledge Building e dintorni. Il confronto con altri modelli.
20110
8 200815
9 20086
10 20073
11 20065
12 2000112
13 199721
14 19961
15 19916
16 19881
17 198214
18 198155
19 198121
20 19771

About Neil H. Schwartz

Neil H. Schwartz is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 43 papers that have together received 632 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (15 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (15 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (10 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (8 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers) and Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (316 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (194 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (69 citations). Neil H. Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Raymond W. Kulhavy, Steven McGee, Bruce C. Howard, Brianna M. Scott, Raymond S. Dean, Steven H. Shaha, Susanne Narciss, Namsoo S. Hong, Christopher Andersen and Michael J. Serra. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Computers in Human Behavior and The American Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026