Neil H. Schwartz

977 total citations
43 papers, 632 citations indexed

About

Neil H. Schwartz is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Neil H. Schwartz has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 632 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 18 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 17 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Neil H. Schwartz's work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (15 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (15 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (10 papers). Neil H. Schwartz is often cited by papers focused on Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (15 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (15 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (10 papers). Neil H. Schwartz collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Neil H. Schwartz's co-authors include Raymond W. Kulhavy, Steven McGee, Bruce C. Howard, Brianna M. Scott, Raymond S. Dean, Steven H. Shaha, Namsoo S. Hong, Susanne Narciss, Christopher Andersen and Michael J. Serra and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Computers in Human Behavior and The American Journal of Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Neil H. Schwartz

42 papers receiving 537 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Neil H. Schwartz United States	14	316	269	194	118	95	43	632
Benjamin D. Jee United States	12	190 0.6×	176 0.7×	130 0.7×	67 0.6×	62 0.7×	26	495
Susan L. Golbeck United States	11	214 0.7×	205 0.8×	68 0.4×	205 1.7×	55 0.6×	26	487
Laura J. Massa United States	4	240 0.8×	155 0.6×	204 1.1×	64 0.5×	63 0.7×	5	475
Raedy M. Ping United States	10	450 1.4×	176 0.7×	241 1.2×	198 1.7×	102 1.1×	13	729
Minna Kyttälä Finland	12	282 0.9×	342 1.3×	189 1.0×	113 1.0×	71 0.7×	27	719
Tim Kühl Germany	16	274 0.9×	166 0.6×	375 1.9×	90 0.8×	87 0.9×	30	613
Jamie Jirout United States	13	400 1.3×	523 1.9×	362 1.9×	118 1.0×	62 0.7×	22	1.1k
Stacy B. Ehrlich United States	8	199 0.6×	278 1.0×	77 0.4×	197 1.7×	44 0.5×	23	540
Delinda van Garderen United States	16	339 1.1×	692 2.6×	115 0.6×	98 0.8×	53 0.6×	43	980
Elizabeth Pezaris United States	13	401 1.3×	340 1.3×	333 1.7×	644 5.5×	118 1.2×	15	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Neil H. Schwartz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil H. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil H. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil H. Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil H. Schwartz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil H. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil H. Schwartz. The network helps show where Neil H. Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil H. Schwartz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil H. Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil H. Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil H. Schwartz. Neil H. Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Schnotz, Wolfgang, et al.. (2021). Multiple mental representations in picture processing. Psychological Research. 86(3). 903–918. 4 indexed citations

Danielson, Robert, et al.. (2020). Effects of keyword tasks and biasing titles on metacognitive monitoring and recall. Metacognition and Learning. 16(1). 233–253. 5 indexed citations

Schwartz, Neil H., et al.. (2018). Trending Now: News Habits of Generation Z. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Zumbach, Joerg & Neil H. Schwartz. (2014). Hyperaudio learning for non-linear auditory knowledge acquisition. Computers in Human Behavior. 41. 365–373. 4 indexed citations

Angeli, Charoula & Neil H. Schwartz. (2014). Differences in electronic exchanges in synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication: the effect of culture as a mediating variable. Interactive Learning Environments. 24(6). 1109–1130. 9 indexed citations

Impedovo, Maria Antonietta, et al.. (2011). 11. Knowledge Building e dintorni. Il confronto con altri modelli.. IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome). 6(2). 90–106.

Ligorio, Maria Beatrice, et al.. (2008). Collaborative Virtual Environments as Means to Increase the Level of Intersubjectivity in a Distributed Cognition System. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 40(3). 339–357. 15 indexed citations

Schwartz, Neil H.. (2008). Exploiting the Use of Technology to Teach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 40(3). 389–404. 6 indexed citations

Schwartz, Neil H., et al.. (2007). Navigating web-based environments: Differentiating internal spatial representations from external spatial displays. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 32(4). 551–568. 3 indexed citations

10.

Schwartz, Neil H., et al.. (2006). Summoning Prior Knowledge: The Influence of Metaphorical Priming on Learning in a Hypermedia Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 35(1). 1–30. 5 indexed citations

11.

Schwartz, Neil H., et al.. (1998). Accessing Prior Knowledge to Remember Text: A Comparison of Advance Organizers and Maps. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 23(1). 65–89. 23 indexed citations

12.

Schwartz, Neil H., et al.. (1997). Predicting teacher referrals of emotionally disturbed children. Psychology in the Schools. 34(1). 51–61. 21 indexed citations

13.

Schwartz, Neil H., et al.. (1996). Comparison of Hualapai school children to national norms on measures of receptive vocabulary and verbal ability. Psychology in the Schools. 33(3). 245–250. 1 indexed citations

14.

Schwartz, Neil H., et al.. (1991). A Factor-Analytic Study of Epistemological Orientation and Related Variables. The Journal of Psychology. 125(1). 91–100. 6 indexed citations

15.

Schwartz, Neil H., et al.. (1991). Individual differences in the retention of maps. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 16(2). 171–182. 27 indexed citations

16.

Dean, Raymond S., et al.. (1988). Inducing comprehension in the inconsistently lateralised reader. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 5(2). 267–288. 1 indexed citations

17.

Kulhavy, Raymond W., Neil H. Schwartz, & Steven H. Shaha. (1982). Interpretative Framework and Memory for Map Features. The American Cartographer. 9(2). 141–147. 14 indexed citations

18.

Schwartz, Neil H. & Raymond W. Kulhavy. (1981). Map features and the recall of discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 6(2). 151–158. 55 indexed citations

19.

Dean, Raymond S., et al.. (1981). Lateral preference patterns as a discriminator of learning difficulties.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 49(2). 227–235. 21 indexed citations

20.

Schwartz, Neil H., et al.. (1977). Mode of Input in Long-Term Recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 44(3). 736–738. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact