Brianna M. Scott

1.2k citations
10 papers · 767 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 7

Brianna M. Scott

10 papers receiving 679 citations

Hit Papers

What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inqu...4672007202620132019100200300400

Peers

Brianna M. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 458
  • Education 482
  • Computer Science Applications 49
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 90
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44
Replace Mehmet Bahar with:
Mehmet Bahar Türkiye
April Luehmann United States
Kathleen E. Metz United States
Donna King Australia
Brian L. Gerber United States
Flávio S. Azevedo United States
Ying Zhan Hong Kong
Konstantinos Ravanis Greece
George E. Glasson United States
Ann Rivet United States
Brianna M. Scott relative to Mehmet Bahar Türkiye Mehmet Bahar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Mehmet Bahar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brianna M. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brianna M. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brianna M. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brianna M. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brianna M. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brianna M. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brianna M. Scott. The network helps show where Brianna M. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Brianna M. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brianna M. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Brianna M. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 20175
2 20151
3
Examining the Domain-Specificity of Metacognition Using Academic Domains and Task-Specific Individual Differences.
201317
4 201324
5 2009162
6 200824
7
What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry?breakdown →
2007467
8 200740
9 200622
10 20065

About Brianna M. Scott

Brianna M. Scott is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 767 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (2 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (1 paper) and Educational Games and Gamification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (458 citations), Education (482 citations) and Computer Science Applications (49 citations). Brianna M. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sasha A. Barab, Troy D. Sadler, Robert L. Goldstone, Sinem Siyahhan, Scott Warren, Adam Ingram‐Goble, Steven J. Zuiker, Neil H. Schwartz, Matthew N. Levy and Michael A. De Miranda. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Learning and Instruction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026