Na Fu

2.7k total citations
75 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Na Fu is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Na Fu has authored 75 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 13 papers in Strategy and Management and 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Na Fu's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (24 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (10 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers). Na Fu is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (24 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (10 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers). Na Fu collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, China and United Kingdom. Na Fu's co-authors include Patrick C. Flood, Janine Bosak, Tim Morris, Philip O’Regan, Catherine Bailey, Kathy Monks, Edel Conway, Kerstin Alfes, Denise M. Rousseau and Qinhai Ma and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Management and European Journal of Operational Research.

In The Last Decade

Na Fu

68 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Na Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 942
  • Strategy and Management 459
  • Social Psychology 241
  • General Health Professions 227
  • Sociology and Political Science 218
Replace Mohammad Mehdi Jabbari with:
Mohammad Mehdi Jabbari Iran
Choi Sang Long Malaysia
Geert Van Hootegem Belgium
Stephen Swailes United Kingdom
Christopher Chan Australia
Rune Todnem By United Kingdom
Lynda Gratton United Kingdom
Ben Kuipers Netherlands
Peter Lok Australia
John H. Humphreys United States
Mohammad Mehdi Jabbari Iran View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Na Fu
Na Fu · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Na Fu
Na Fu · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Na Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Na Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Na Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Na Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Na Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Na Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Na Fu. The network helps show where Na Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Na Fu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Na Fu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Na Fu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Na Fu. Na Fu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 3
3 26
4 6
5 29
6 8
7 2
8 1
9 10
10 3
11 59
12
Perceived human resource system strength and employee reactions toward change: Revisiting human resource's remit as change agent
1
13 0
14 52
15 73
16 45
17 19
18
Pet Ownership and Socio-emotion of School Children
4
19 1
20
Influence of Pets on the Empty Nester Family
1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026