Michael Clinton

65 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Michael Clinton
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Research and Theory 118
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 510
  • General Health Professions 668
  • Demography 275
  • Health 144
Replace Arla Day with:
Arla Day Canada
Geneviève L. Lavigne Canada
Stéphanie Austin Canada
Gail Kinman United Kingdom
Peter P. M. Janssen Netherlands
Arlene Walker Australia
Anat Drach‐Zahavy Israel
Igor Portoghese Italy
Carroll Iwasiw Canada
Michael Clinton relative to Arla Day Canada Arla Day's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Arla Day · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Clinton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Clinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Clinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Clinton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Clinton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Clinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Clinton. The network helps show where Michael Clinton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Clinton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Clinton Line = papers co-authored together Michael Clinton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20234
3 20234
4 20216
5 2016100
6 20150
7
‘Technologies of the Self’ as Instrumentality: Becoming Instruments of the Pharmaceutical Industry through Normative Practices
20131
8 201359
9 2012211
10 201190
11 20073
12
A Grounded Theory of Portfolio Working: Experiencing the Smallest of Small Businesses
20069
13 200642
14 200569
15 2004101
16 200044
17 199932
18 19980
19 199729
20 19971

About Michael Clinton

Michael Clinton is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Leadership and Management, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (17 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Nursing education and management (5 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (118 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (510 citations), General Health Professions (668 citations), Demography (275 citations) and Health (144 citations). Michael Clinton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Guest, Michael Hazelton, Neil Conway, Jane Sturges, Martin R. Edwards, T. W. Knight, Trevor Murrells, Sarah Robinson, Alexandra Budjanovcanin and Paul Jansen. Their work appears in journals such as Human Resource Management Journal, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Journal of Vocational Behavior and Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026