Human Resource Management Journal

1.1k papers and 43.9k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Human Resource Management Journal in the last decades have received a total of 43.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Human Resource Management Journal usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (614 papers), Sociology and Political Science (248 papers) and General Health Professions (235 papers) specifically the topics of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (325 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (212 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (183 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Resource Management Journal are David Guest, Peter Boxall, John Purcell, Paul Boselie, Anthony Ferner, Jaap Paauwe, Sue Hutchinson, Graham Dietz, Corine Boon and Patrick M. Wright.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Resource Management Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Resource Management Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Resource Management Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Human Resource Management Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Resource Management Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Resource Management Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Resource Management Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026