Liesje De Backer
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Information Systems
- Co-authors
- Hilde Van KeerMartín ValckeBeatrijs MoerkerkeFien De SmedtEmmelien MerchieIngo KollarMarkus DreselInge Molenaar
- Topics
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (16 papers)Reflective Practices in Education (6 papers)Online and Blended Learning (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Liesje De Backer
15 papers receiving 429 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 327
- Education 313
- Computer Science Applications 53
- Social Psychology 50
- Information Systems 42
Countries citing papers authored by Liesje De Backer
This map shows the geographic impact of Liesje De Backer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liesje De Backer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liesje De Backer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liesje De Backer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liesje De Backer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liesje De Backer. The network helps show where Liesje De Backer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liesje De Backer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liesje De Backer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liesje De Backer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liesje De Backer. Liesje De Backer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | 40 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 67 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | Exploring the relations between reciprocal peer tutoring groups' metacognitive regulation, cognitive processing, and transactive discussions | 1 |
| 12 | 58 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | Learning to regulate from peers? An analysis on peer tutoring groups' metacognitive regulation | 1 |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 97 | |
| 17 | Tutors maken het verschil. Tutoring en begeleidingsinitiatieven in het Vlaamse onderwijs | 0 |
About Liesje De Backer
Liesje De Backer is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 17 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (16 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (6 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (327 citations), Education (313 citations) and Computer Science Applications (53 citations). Liesje De Backer has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Hilde Van Keer, Martín Valcke, Beatrijs Moerkerke, Fien De Smedt, Emmelien Merchie, Ingo Kollar, Markus Dresel, Inge Molenaar, Tina Seufert and Armin Weinberger. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Learning and Instruction and Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.