Marjolein Maas

569 total citations
9 papers, 376 citations indexed

About

Marjolein Maas is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Marjolein Maas has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 376 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Marjolein Maas's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers). Marjolein Maas is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers). Marjolein Maas collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands. Marjolein Maas's co-authors include Kees van den Bos, P. Marijn Poortvliet, Joost Miedema, Gün R. Semin, Martin Euwema, Henk Aarts, Ruud Custers, Judith Wolf, Dike van de Mheen and Carola T. M. Schrijvers and has published in prestigious journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Marjolein Maas

9 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marjolein Maas Netherlands 7 248 205 116 58 49 9 376
Amarina Ariyanto Indonesia 9 315 1.3× 220 1.1× 74 0.6× 39 0.7× 40 0.8× 22 456
Frank Kachanoff Canada 12 191 0.8× 200 1.0× 79 0.7× 65 1.1× 93 1.9× 18 372
Conrad Baldner Italy 10 219 0.9× 180 0.9× 105 0.9× 79 1.4× 58 1.2× 36 402
Noa Schori‐Eyal Israel 13 449 1.8× 268 1.3× 89 0.8× 31 0.5× 86 1.8× 21 579
Lydia Eckstein Jackson United States 7 202 0.8× 209 1.0× 98 0.8× 28 0.5× 62 1.3× 10 345
Jennifer Tong United States 5 239 1.0× 239 1.2× 89 0.8× 57 1.0× 51 1.0× 6 416
Justin T. Buckingham United States 9 154 0.6× 130 0.6× 72 0.6× 63 1.1× 56 1.1× 17 368
Roberta Rosa Valtorta Italy 10 162 0.7× 139 0.7× 54 0.5× 29 0.5× 72 1.5× 29 333
Yvette van Osch Netherlands 10 170 0.7× 199 1.0× 57 0.5× 24 0.4× 80 1.6× 17 396
Saera R. Khan United States 10 284 1.1× 214 1.0× 116 1.0× 65 1.1× 42 0.9× 20 416

Countries citing papers authored by Marjolein Maas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marjolein Maas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marjolein Maas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marjolein Maas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marjolein Maas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marjolein Maas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marjolein Maas. The network helps show where Marjolein Maas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marjolein Maas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marjolein Maas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marjolein Maas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marjolein Maas. Marjolein Maas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Schrijvers, Carola T. M., et al.. (2014). Middelengebruik en psychische klachten van daklozen in de vier grote steden. 10(1). 19–36. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bos, Kees van den & Marjolein Maas. (2012). 20. Adhering to consistency principles in an unjust world: implications for sense-making, victim blaming, and justice judgments. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 424–444. 1 indexed citations
3.
Maas, Marjolein & Kees van den Bos. (2011). Real Personal Uncertainty Induced by Means of Task-Related Feedback: Effects on Reactions to Voice and No-Voice Procedures. Social Justice Research. 24(2). 107–125. 6 indexed citations
4.
Bos, Kees van den & Marjolein Maas. (2009). On the Psychology of the Belief in a Just World: Exploring Experiential and Rationalistic Paths to Victim Blaming. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 35(12). 1567–1578. 65 indexed citations
5.
Maas, Marjolein & Kees van den Bos. (2009). An affective-experiential perspective on reactions to fair and unfair events: Individual differences in affect intensity moderated by experiential mindsets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45(4). 667–675. 19 indexed citations
6.
Custers, Ruud, et al.. (2008). Nonconscious goal pursuit and the surmounting of physical and social obstacles. European Journal of Social Psychology. 38(6). 1013–1022. 22 indexed citations
7.
Bos, Kees van den, Martin Euwema, P. Marijn Poortvliet, & Marjolein Maas. (2007). Uncertainty Management and Social Issues: Uncertainty as an Important Determinant of Reactions to Socially Deviating People1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 37(8). 1726–1756. 38 indexed citations
8.
9.
Bos, Kees van den, et al.. (2003). Toward Understanding the Psychology of Reactions to Perceived Fairness: The Role of Affect Intensity. Social Justice Research. 16(2). 151–168. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026