John de Wit

12.0k total citations
297 papers, 8.2k citations indexed

About

John de Wit is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, John de Wit has authored 297 papers receiving a total of 8.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 165 papers in Infectious Diseases, 119 papers in Epidemiology and 105 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in John de Wit's work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (164 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (109 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (77 papers). John de Wit is often cited by papers focused on HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (164 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (109 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (77 papers). John de Wit collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. John de Wit's co-authors include Denise T. D. de Ridder, Wolfgang Stroebe, Emely de Vet, Toby Lea, Marieke A. Adriaanse, F. Marijn Stok, Martin Holt, Natascha de Hoog, Enny Das and Robert Rеynolds and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

John de Wit

284 papers receiving 7.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John de Wit Netherlands 47 3.4k 2.8k 2.3k 2.1k 1.6k 297 8.2k
Rebecca L. Collins United States 53 1.2k 0.4× 2.7k 1.0× 2.8k 1.2× 3.2k 1.5× 1.7k 1.1× 219 11.8k
Laura M. Bogart United States 57 5.3k 1.5× 3.5k 1.3× 2.9k 1.3× 4.0k 1.9× 279 0.2× 285 11.7k
José A. Bauermeister United States 51 4.7k 1.4× 2.8k 1.0× 2.5k 1.1× 3.8k 1.8× 388 0.2× 337 9.4k
Michael P. Carey United States 74 5.0k 1.5× 5.5k 2.0× 2.9k 1.2× 8.0k 3.9× 2.4k 1.5× 334 17.3k
Bonita Stanton United States 61 4.3k 1.3× 2.9k 1.0× 3.4k 1.5× 6.1k 2.9× 398 0.3× 337 12.7k
Debra A. Murphy United States 54 4.5k 1.3× 1.9k 0.7× 1.1k 0.5× 4.1k 2.0× 299 0.2× 165 8.4k
Susan M. Kegeles United States 50 4.4k 1.3× 2.5k 0.9× 2.1k 0.9× 5.2k 2.5× 302 0.2× 127 8.2k
Wayne T. Steward United States 31 2.4k 0.7× 1.6k 0.6× 867 0.4× 1.4k 0.7× 448 0.3× 97 4.2k
Rebecca Bunnell United States 50 4.5k 1.3× 2.6k 0.9× 956 0.4× 3.0k 1.5× 513 0.3× 131 9.0k
Sheana Bull United States 45 1.9k 0.6× 1.3k 0.5× 1.4k 0.6× 4.1k 2.0× 662 0.4× 177 7.2k

Countries citing papers authored by John de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John de Wit. The network helps show where John de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John de Wit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John de Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John de Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John de Wit. John de Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Bal, Michèlle, et al.. (2024). The current state of complex systems research on socioeconomic inequalities in health and health behavior—a systematic scoping review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 21(1). 13–13. 9 indexed citations
3.
Verra, Sanne E., Clare R. Evans, Joost Oude Groeniger, et al.. (2024). Intersectional inequalities in mental health by education, income, gender, and age before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a longitudinal study. International Journal for Equity in Health. 23(1). 250–250. 3 indexed citations
4.
Wit, John de, et al.. (2023). The Importance of Social Engagement in the Development of an HIV Cure: A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Perspectives. AIDS and Behavior. 27(11). 3789–3812. 8 indexed citations
5.
Pijl, Marit S. G. van der, et al.. (2023). Pregnant women’s perceptions of antenatal care and utilisation of digital health tools in Magu District, Tanzania: a qualitative study. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters. 31(1). 2236782–2236782. 4 indexed citations
7.
Nieuwkerk, Pythia T., et al.. (2023). Between delivering chronic care and answering patients' burdens: Understanding HIV specialist nurses' experiences in the age of treatment. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 80(5). 1943–1954. 2 indexed citations
10.
Xiridou, Maria, Philippe Adam, Maartje Visser, et al.. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hepatitis B virus vaccination and transmission among men who have sex with men: A mathematical modelling study. Vaccine. 40(33). 4889–4896. 6 indexed citations
11.
Dijk, Mart van, John de Wit, Thomas E. Guadamuz, Joel E. Martínez, & Kai J. Jonas. (2021). Bridging the serodivide: attitudes of PrEP users towards sex partners living with HIV. AIDS Care. 34(3). 349–352. 5 indexed citations
12.
Koning, Ina M., et al.. (2021). Pre-Intervention Effects of a Community-Based Intervention Targeting Alcohol Use (LEF); The Role of Participatory Research and Publicity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(16). 8823–8823. 5 indexed citations
13.
Holt, Martin, Evelyn Lee, Toby Lea, et al.. (2020). HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Cascades to Assess Implementation in Australia: Results From Repeated, National Behavioral Surveillance of Gay and Bisexual Men, 2014–2018. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 83(3). e16–e22. 26 indexed citations
14.
Newman, Christy E., Limin Mao, Asha Persson, et al.. (2015). ‘Not Until I'm Absolutely Half-Dead and Have To:’ Accounting for Non-Use of Antiretroviral Therapy in Semi-Structured Interviews with People Living with HIV in Australia. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 29(5). 267–278. 14 indexed citations
15.
Mao, Limin, Susan Kippax, Martin Holt, et al.. (2011). Rates of condom and non-condom-based anal intercourse practices among homosexually active men in Australia: deliberate HIV risk reduction?. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 87(6). 489–493. 48 indexed citations
16.
Ridder, Denise T. D. de, et al.. (2011). Do distant foods decrease intake? The effect of food accessibility on consumption. Psychology and Health. 27(sup2). 59–73. 83 indexed citations
17.
Holt, Martin, Jeanne Ellard, & John de Wit. (2011). Are we prepared for biomedical HIV prevention?: The case of pre-exposure prophylaxis. 9(3). 12. 1 indexed citations
18.
Stok, F. Marijn, Denise T. D. de Ridder, Marieke A. Adriaanse, & John de Wit. (2010). Looking cool or attaining self-rule. Different motives for autonomy and their effects on unhealthy snack purchase. Appetite. 54(3). 607–610. 28 indexed citations
19.
Wit, John de, et al.. (2009). HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmissible Infections in Australia Annual Report of Trends in Behaviour 2009. UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia). 58 indexed citations
20.
Wit, John de. (1982). Flikkers in Vlaanderen. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026