Julian Decius

580 citations
27 papers · 359 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Julian Decius

25 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Julian Decius
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 70
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 182
  • Applied Psychology 51
  • Communication 70
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 36
Replace F.J. van der Krogt with:
F.J. van der Krogt Netherlands
Anna Fausta Scardigno Italy
Jan Streumer Netherlands
Sohee Park South Korea
Francis Kasekende Uganda
Sandra Penger Slovenia
Hülya Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu Türkiye
Ellen Scully‐Russ United States
Muhammad Shahnawaz Adil Pakistan
Essa Khan Pakistan
Julian Decius relative to F.J. van der Krogt Netherlands F.J. van der Krogt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23.3×
F.J. van der Krogt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julian Decius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julian Decius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julian Decius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julian Decius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julian Decius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julian Decius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julian Decius. The network helps show where Julian Decius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Julian Decius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julian Decius Line = papers co-authored together Julian Decius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201981
2 202151
3 202129
4 202325
5 201724
6 202121
7 202216
8 202316
9 202215
10 202214
11 202312
12 20238
13 20236
14 20246
15 20235
16 20245
17 20225
18 20244
19 20244
20 20254

About Julian Decius

Julian Decius is a scholar working on Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education and Employability (11 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (10 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (6 papers), Corporate Management and Leadership (5 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (3 papers), Organizational Learning and Leadership (3 papers) and Innovation, Technology, and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (70 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (182 citations), Applied Psychology (51 citations), Communication (70 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (36 citations). Julian Decius has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Niclas Schaper, Andreas Seifert, Michael Knappstein, Katharina Klug, Timo Kortsch, Muhammad Naveed, Carolin Graßmann, Julia Hein, Anja Schmitz and Simone Kauffeld. Their work appears in journals such as Human Resource Development Quarterly, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies and Vocations and Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact