Vocations and Learning

335 papers and 5.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 335 papers published in Vocations and Learning in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Vocations and Learning usually cover Education (191 papers), Human Factors and Ergonomics (143 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (69 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Education and Learning Practices (143 papers), Higher Education and Employability (96 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Vocations and Learning are Päivi Tynjälä, Matthias Pilz, Andreas Gegenfurtner, Gert Biesta, Phil Hodkinson, David James, Eva Kyndt, Filip Dochy, Sofia Nyström and Afsaneh Bagheri.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Vocations and Learning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Vocations and Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Vocations and Learning.

Countries where authors publish in Vocations and Learning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Vocations and Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Vocations and Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vocations and Learning more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025