Jacob Bradburn
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Clinical Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Russell E. JohnsonChu‐Hsiang ChangSzu‐Han LinHun Whee LeeChristopher D. NyeJeffrey OlenickJoshua J. PrasadFritz Drasgow
- Topics
- Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Applied PsychologyJournal of Vocational Behavior
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jacob Bradburn
10 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 128
- Social Psychology 124
- Sociology and Political Science 76
- Clinical Psychology 65
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
Countries citing papers authored by Jacob Bradburn
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob Bradburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob Bradburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob Bradburn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob Bradburn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob Bradburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob Bradburn. The network helps show where Jacob Bradburn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacob Bradburn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacob Bradburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacob Bradburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacob Bradburn. Jacob Bradburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 151 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 72 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 30 |
About Jacob Bradburn
Jacob Bradburn is a scholar working on General Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 11 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (128 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations) and Social Psychology (124 citations). Jacob Bradburn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Russell E. Johnson, Chu‐Hsiang Chang, Szu‐Han Lin, Hun Whee Lee, Christopher D. Nye, Jeffrey Olenick, Joshua J. Prasad, Fritz Drasgow, Neal Schmitt and Ann Marie Ryan. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Vocational Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.