Helen Monks
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Donna CrossStacey WatersThérèse ShawLeanne LesterLydia HearnMelanie EpsteinNatasha PearceLaura Thomas
- Topics
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (9 papers)Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers)Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers)
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of ParamedicineSex RolesInternational Journal of Behavioral Development
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Helen Monks
15 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Social Psychology 311
- Education 207
- Clinical Psychology 144
- Safety Research 89
- Sociology and Political Science 78
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Monks
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Monks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Monks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Monks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Monks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Monks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Monks. The network helps show where Helen Monks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Monks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Monks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Monks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Monks. Helen Monks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Lessons from schools with high levels of support for students with Type 1 diabetes: A qualitative study | 1 |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | Young people's views regarding participation in mental health and wellbeing research through social media | 6 |
| 8 | Evaluating the capacity of Australian school staff to recognise and respond to cyberbullying behaviours | 1 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | School-based strategies to address cyber bullying | 9 |
| 12 | 106 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | 101 | |
| 15 | Australian covert bullying prevalence study | 69 |
| 16 | The interaction of government funders and management in regional development organisations | 1 |
About Helen Monks
Helen Monks is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 16 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (9 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (311 citations), Safety Research (89 citations) and Education (207 citations). Helen Monks has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Donna Cross, Stacey Waters, Thérèse Shaw, Leanne Lester, Lydia Hearn, Melanie Epstein, Natasha Pearce, Laura Thomas, Phillip T. Slee and Greg Hamilton. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Sex Roles and International Journal of Behavioral Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.