Natasha Pearce
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Donna CrossStacey WatersLeanne LesterHelen MonksAmy BarnesSharyn BurnsThérèse ShawS. Beatty
- Topics
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (14 papers)Child Development and Digital Technology (6 papers)Youth Development and Social Support (6 papers)
In The Last Decade
Natasha Pearce
19 papers receiving 379 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Social Psychology 297
- Education 184
- Clinical Psychology 120
- Safety Research 90
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 76
Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Pearce
This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Pearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Pearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Pearce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Pearce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Pearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Pearce. The network helps show where Natasha Pearce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Pearce
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Pearce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Pearce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Pearce. Natasha Pearce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | Lessons from schools with high levels of support for students with Type 1 diabetes: A qualitative study | 1 |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | Evaluating the capacity of Australian school staff to recognise and respond to cyberbullying behaviours | 1 |
| 18 | 63 | |
| 19 | 106 | |
| 20 | School-based Intervention Research to Reduce Bullying in Australia 1999-2007: What works, What Doesn't, and What's Promising? | 2 |
About Natasha Pearce
Natasha Pearce is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Safety Research and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (14 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (6 papers) and Youth Development and Social Support (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (297 citations), Safety Research (90 citations) and Education (184 citations). Natasha Pearce has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Donna Cross, Stacey Waters, Leanne Lester, Helen Monks, Amy Barnes, Sharyn Burns, Thérèse Shaw, S. Beatty, Kevin Runions and Clare Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.