Melanie Epstein

11 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Melanie Epstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Safety Research 71
  • Social Psychology 172
  • Clinical Psychology 93
  • Education 105
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 42
Replace Saskia M. Fischer with:
Saskia M. Fischer Germany
David K. Duys United States
Nadia S. Ansary United States
Stephen James Minton Ireland
Andrés Molano Colombia
Helen Monks Australia
Elisabeth Stefanek Austria
Amarzaya Jadambaa Australia
Gökhan Atık Türkiye
Natasha Pearce Australia
Melanie Epstein relative to Saskia M. Fischer Germany Saskia M. Fischer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Saskia M. Fischer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Epstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Epstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Epstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Epstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Epstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Epstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Epstein. The network helps show where Melanie Epstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melanie Epstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melanie Epstein Line = papers co-authored together Melanie Epstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1
Australian covert bullying prevalence study
200969
2 201152
3 201840
4 201231
5 202025
6 202213
7 201511
8 20177
9
Center for Child and Family Health-North Carolina. What is it? And why?
19991
10 20221
11
Evaluating the capacity of Australian school staff to recognise and respond to cyberbullying behaviours
20151
12 20151

About Melanie Epstein

Melanie Epstein is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (7 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (2 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (1 paper), Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper) and Education Discipline and Inequality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (71 citations), Social Psychology (172 citations), Clinical Psychology (93 citations), Education (105 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (42 citations). Melanie Epstein has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Donna Cross, Thérèse Shaw, Helen Monks, Lydia Hearn, Leanne Lester, Amy Barnes, Laura Thomas, Phillip T. Slee, Stacey Waters and Natasha Pearce. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, Aggressive Behavior, Journal of Child and Family Studies and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact