H. Agerhem

663 total citations
9 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

H. Agerhem is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, H. Agerhem has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 4 papers in Food Science and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in H. Agerhem's work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (3 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (2 papers). H. Agerhem is often cited by papers focused on Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (3 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (2 papers). H. Agerhem collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Spain. H. Agerhem's co-authors include Elisabeth Borch, C. Claudi-Magnussen, Derek V. Byrne, Kerstin Lundström, M. Martens, Marit Rødbotten, Eva Tornberg, Ann-Charlotte Enfält, Klaus Fischer and Dawn Homer and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Food Microbiology, Meat Science and Food Quality and Preference.

In The Last Decade

H. Agerhem

9 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
H. Agerhem Denmark 8 374 177 71 66 61 9 449
C. Claudi-Magnussen Denmark 8 519 1.4× 202 1.1× 87 1.2× 71 1.1× 74 1.2× 12 630
Lisa Meier-Dinkel Germany 15 335 0.9× 219 1.2× 70 1.0× 81 1.2× 88 1.4× 19 497
Sérgio Bertelli Pflanzer Brazil 14 400 1.1× 240 1.4× 58 0.8× 80 1.2× 53 0.9× 48 572
N. Warnants Belgium 15 850 2.3× 183 1.0× 176 2.5× 89 1.3× 51 0.8× 24 992
Danijel Karolyi Croatia 13 268 0.7× 104 0.6× 36 0.5× 60 0.9× 18 0.3× 83 449
I. L. Larsen Canada 16 546 1.5× 139 0.8× 51 0.7× 109 1.7× 106 1.7× 57 640
Matthew G. Kerr Australia 10 365 1.0× 111 0.6× 29 0.4× 56 0.8× 54 0.9× 13 423
J. Jensen United States 10 411 1.1× 193 1.1× 50 0.7× 48 0.7× 62 1.0× 11 449
J.M. Behrends United States 12 319 0.9× 96 0.5× 63 0.9× 45 0.7× 30 0.5× 18 399
Mariko A. Francombe United Kingdom 7 197 0.5× 115 0.6× 61 0.9× 17 0.3× 17 0.3× 8 294

Countries citing papers authored by H. Agerhem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Agerhem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Agerhem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Agerhem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Agerhem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Agerhem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Agerhem. The network helps show where H. Agerhem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Agerhem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Agerhem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Agerhem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Agerhem. H. Agerhem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Byrne, Derek V., Marit Rødbotten, C. Claudi-Magnussen, et al.. (2003). Consumer and sensory investigations in relation to physical/chemical aspects of cooked pork in Scandinavia. Meat Science. 65(2). 737–748. 64 indexed citations
2.
Hansen, Laurits Lydehøj, H. Agerhem, Katja Rosenvold, & M. T. Jensen. (2002). Effect of Brussels sprouts and inulin/rape seed cake on the sensory profile of pork M. longissimus dorsi. Meat Science. 61(4). 441–448. 14 indexed citations
3.
Byrne, Derek V., Marit Rødbotten, C. Claudi-Magnussen, et al.. (2002). Consumer perceptions of pork in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Food Quality and Preference. 13(5). 257–266. 75 indexed citations
5.
Matthews, K.R., Dawn Homer, Pieter Punter, et al.. (2000). An international study on the importance of androstenone and skatole for boar taint: III. Consumer survey in seven European countries. Meat Science. 54(3). 271–283. 77 indexed citations
6.
Dijksterhuis, Garmt, B. Engel, P. Walstra, et al.. (2000). An international study on the importance of androstenone and skatole for boar taint: II. Sensory evaluation by trained panels in seven European countries. Meat Science. 54(3). 261–269. 65 indexed citations
7.
Lundström, Kerstin, Ann-Charlotte Enfält, Eva Tornberg, & H. Agerhem. (1998). Sensory and technological meat quality in carriers and non-carriers of the RN− allele in Hampshire crosses and in purebred Yorkshire pigs. Meat Science. 48(1-2). 115–124. 63 indexed citations
8.
Agerhem, H. & Eva Tornberg. (1993). Sensory quality of whole pig meat—The influence of different factors and the interrelation between profile panel, consumer choice and instrumental recordings. Food Quality and Preference. 4(1-2). 102–103. 1 indexed citations
9.
Borch, Elisabeth & H. Agerhem. (1992). Chemical, microbial and sensory changes during the anaerobic cold storage of beef inoculated with a homofermentative Lactobacillus sp. or a Leuconostoc sp.. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 15(1-2). 99–108. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026