Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance
19965.8k citationsG. T. Lumpkin, Gregory G. DessAcademy of Management Reviewprofile →
Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future
20092.5k citationsG. T. Lumpkin et al.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practiceprofile →
Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance
19962.4k citationsG. T. Lumpkin, Gregory G. DessAcademy of Management Reviewprofile →
Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance
20012.2k citationsG. T. Lumpkin, Gregory G. DessJournal of Business Venturingprofile →
The Relationship of Personality to Entrepreneurial Intentions and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review
20091.0k citationsHao Zhao, Scott E. Seibert et al.Journal of Managementprofile →
Research in social entrepreneurship: past contributions and future opportunities
2009828 citationsJeremy C. Short, Todd W. Moss et al.Strategic Entrepreneurship Journalprofile →
Entrepreneurial Orientation Theory and Research: Reflections on a Needed Construct
2011825 citationsJeffrey G. Covin, G. T. LumpkinEntrepreneurship Theory and Practiceprofile →
Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models
1997820 citationsGregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin et al.profile →
The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Stimulating Effective Corporate Entrepreneurship
2005706 citationsGregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkinprofile →
Enhancing Entrepreneurial Orientation Research: Operationalizing and Measuring a Key Strategic Decision Making Process
2000605 citationsG. T. Lumpkin, Gregory G. Dess et al.Journal of Managementprofile →
Long–Term Orientation and Intertemporal Choice in Family Firms
2011451 citationsG. T. Lumpkin, Keith H. BrighamEntrepreneurship Theory and Practiceprofile →
Is It Okay to Study Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) at the Individual Level? Yes!
202371 citationsDaniel R. Clark, Robert J. Pidduck et al.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practiceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of G. T. Lumpkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. T. Lumpkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. T. Lumpkin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. T. Lumpkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. T. Lumpkin. The network helps show where G. T. Lumpkin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. T. Lumpkin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. T. Lumpkin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. T. Lumpkin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. T. Lumpkin. G. T. Lumpkin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Clark, Daniel R., Robert J. Pidduck, G. T. Lumpkin, & Jeffrey G. Covin. (2023). Is It Okay to Study Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) at the Individual Level? Yes!. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 48(1). 349–391.71 indexed citations breakdown →
Lumpkin, G. T., Alexander McKelvie, David Gras, & Robert S. Nason. (2010). Is Strategy Different for Very Small and New Firms. Journal of Small Business Strategy. 21(2). 1–26.16 indexed citations
12.
Zhao, Hao, Scott E. Seibert, & G. T. Lumpkin. (2009). The Relationship of Personality to Entrepreneurial Intentions and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Management. 36(2). 381–404.1022 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Hansen, David J. & G. T. Lumpkin. (2009). TESTING AND REFINING A CREATIVITY-BASED MODEL OF OPPORTUNITY RECOGNITION. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 29(17). 2.1 indexed citations
14.
Cogliser, Claudia C., Keith H. Brigham, & G. T. Lumpkin. (2008). ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION RESEARCH: A REVIEW OF THEORY, MEASUREMENT, AND DATA-ANALYTIC PRACTICES (SUMMARY). Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 28(13). 5.3 indexed citations
15.
Moss, Todd W., G. T. Lumpkin, & Jeremy C. Short. (2008). THE DEPENDENT VARIABLES OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH. SSRN Electronic Journal. 28(21). 3.8 indexed citations
16.
Hills, Gerald E., et al.. (2006). Opportunity Recognition: Examining How Search Formality and Search Processes Relate to the Reasons for Pursuing Entrepreneurship. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
17.
Lumpkin, G. T., et al.. (2006). Measuring Emergence in the Dynamics of New Venture Creation. SSRN Electronic Journal.15 indexed citations
18.
Dess, Gregory G. & G. T. Lumpkin. (2001). Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle. SSRN Electronic Journal.298 indexed citations
19.
Lumpkin, G. T. & Gregory G. Dess. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance. Academy of Management Review. 21(1). 135–172.5829 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.