Eric Clinton

31 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

Eric Clinton
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 471
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 471
  • Business and International Management 86
  • Accounting 255
  • Strategy and Management 68
Replace Miriam Bird with:
Miriam Bird Switzerland
María José Parada Spain
Andy Yu United States
Ramona K. Zachary United States
Jing Xi China
Frank Spiegel Germany
Juha Kansikas Finland
A. Bakr Ibrahim Canada
Erick P. C. Chang United States
Robert V. Randolph United States
Eric Clinton relative to Miriam Bird Switzerland Miriam Bird's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Miriam Bird · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Clinton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Clinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Clinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Clinton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Clinton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Clinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Clinton. The network helps show where Eric Clinton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eric Clinton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric Clinton Line = papers co-authored together Eric Clinton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018121
2 2011115
3 201850
4 201950
5 201342
6 202035
7 202334
8 201831
9 202029
10 202026
11 202223
12 202320
13 202110
14 20239
15 20166
16 20203
17 20193
18 20242
19 20212
20 20242

About Eric Clinton

Eric Clinton is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science and Business and International Management, having authored 37 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Business Performance and Succession (34 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (26 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (5 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (4 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (4 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (2 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (471 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (471 citations), Business and International Management (86 citations), Accounting (255 citations) and Strategy and Management (68 citations). Eric Clinton has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Vanessa Diaz‐Moriana, Robert S. Nason, Maura McAdam, Nadine Kammerlander, Jordan Robert Gamble, Philipp Sieger, Thomas Zellweger, Justin B. Craig, Colm O’Gorman and G. T. Lumpkin. Their work appears in journals such as Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Family Business Review, Journal of Business Research, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation and Journal of Management Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact