Howard E. Aldrich
About
In The Last Decade
Howard E. Aldrich
188 papers receiving 22.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
- Management of Technology and Innovation 10.8k
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 8.6k
- Strategy and Management 7.2k
- Sociology and Political Science 7.0k
- Accounting 5.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Howard E. Aldrich
This map shows the geographic impact of Howard E. Aldrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Howard E. Aldrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Howard E. Aldrich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Howard E. Aldrich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Howard E. Aldrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Howard E. Aldrich. The network helps show where Howard E. Aldrich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Howard E. Aldrich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Howard E. Aldrich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Howard E. Aldrich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Howard E. Aldrich. Howard E. Aldrich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | ALL ORGANIZATIONS WERE ONCE NEW: REVISITING STINCHCOMBE'S LIABILITY OF NEWNESS HYPOTHESIS (SUMMARY) | 2 |
| 3 | RESOURCE DRAIN OR PROCESS GAINS? TEAM STATUS CHARACTERISTICS AND GROUP FUNCTIONING AMONG STARTUP TEAMS | 9 |
| 4 | STATUS CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTRIBUTION RECOGNITIONS WITHIN STARTUP TEAMS | 1 |
| 5 | THE IMPACT OF PAST PERFORMANCE ON THE EXIT OF TEAM MEMBERS IN YOUNG FIRMS: THE ROLE OF TEAM COMPOSITION | 14 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Teams that Work Together, Stay Together: Resiliency of Entrepreneurial Teams | 7 |
| 8 | On Their Own Terms? Gendered Rhetoric versus Behaviour in Small Firms | 5 |
| 9 | Is there a Wealth Effect? Financial and Human Capital as Determinants of Business Startups | 9 |
| 10 | The Trouble with Gurus: Responses to Dependence and the Emergence of Employment Practices in Entrepreneurial Firms | 7 |
| 11 | Human Resource Management Practices and Organizational Life Cycles | 54 |
| 12 | Cross-National Similarities in the Personal Networks of Small Business Owners: A Comparison of Two Regions in North America | 1 |
| 13 | Friends and Strangers: Early Hiring Practices and Idiosyncratic Jobs | 8 |
| 14 | The Go-Between: Brokers' Roles in Entrepreneurial Networks | 11 |
| 15 | Using an Ecological Perspective to Study Organizational Founding Rates | 7 |
| 16 | Asian Residential Concentration and Business Development | 0 |
| 17 | Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications breakdown → | 445 |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | Ecological Succession in Racially Changing Neighborhoods: A Review of the Literature | 37 |
| 20 | Patterns of Vandalism During Civil Disorders as an Indication of Target Selection | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.