Elizabeth Adams

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
39 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Elizabeth Adams is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Information Systems and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth Adams has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Computer Science Applications, 16 papers in Information Systems and 4 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth Adams's work include Teaching and Learning Programming (10 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (5 papers) and Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (5 papers). Elizabeth Adams is often cited by papers focused on Teaching and Learning Programming (10 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (5 papers) and Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (5 papers). Elizabeth Adams collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Elizabeth Adams's co-authors include Jens Bennedsen, James H. Paterson, Arnold Pears, Marie Devlin, Linda Mannila, Stephen B. Seidman, Lauri Malmi, William Fone, Raymond Lister and Lynda Thomas and has published in prestigious journals such as eLife, BioMed Research International and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth Adams

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

A multi-national study of reading and tracing skills in n... 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth Adams United States 12 988 416 297 279 190 39 1.2k
Carsten Schulte Germany 21 982 1.0× 414 1.0× 509 1.7× 162 0.6× 169 0.9× 100 1.5k
John Hamer New Zealand 23 1.2k 1.2× 651 1.6× 364 1.2× 275 1.0× 155 0.8× 55 1.7k
Cary Laxer United States 12 883 0.9× 396 1.0× 296 1.0× 242 0.9× 145 0.8× 48 1.2k
Michael E. Caspersen Denmark 20 1.3k 1.3× 529 1.3× 365 1.2× 321 1.2× 193 1.0× 62 1.5k
Carol Zander United States 21 1.2k 1.2× 583 1.4× 437 1.5× 262 0.9× 213 1.1× 59 1.6k
Anna Eckerdal Sweden 22 1.1k 1.1× 592 1.4× 274 0.9× 321 1.2× 115 0.6× 76 1.4k
Vicki L. Almstrum United States 15 1.5k 1.5× 664 1.6× 443 1.5× 387 1.4× 265 1.4× 50 1.8k
Juha Sorva Finland 18 1.1k 1.1× 550 1.3× 364 1.2× 134 0.5× 244 1.3× 48 1.3k
Mikko‐Jussi Laakso Finland 20 805 0.8× 402 1.0× 261 0.9× 173 0.6× 163 0.9× 97 1.2k
António José Mendes Portugal 18 925 0.9× 467 1.1× 233 0.8× 146 0.5× 77 0.4× 113 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Adams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Adams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Adams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Adams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Adams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Adams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Adams. The network helps show where Elizabeth Adams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Adams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Adams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Adams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Adams. Elizabeth Adams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Adams, Elizabeth, et al.. (2024). Sources of Stress and Coping Strategies Among Urban African American Adolescents: A Qualitative Study of Child and Caregiver Perspectives. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 12(4). 2286–2292. 1 indexed citations
2.
Lanoye, Autumn, Elizabeth Adams, & Bernard F. Fuemmeler. (2022). Obesity and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Current topics in behavioral neurosciences. 57. 221–241. 1 indexed citations
3.
Ketterlin–Geller, Leanne R., et al.. (2019). Integrating Validation Arguments With the Assessment Triangle: A Framework for Operationalizing and Instantiating Validation. Applied Measurement in Education. 32(1). 60–76. 1 indexed citations
4.
Darbin, Olivier, et al.. (2016). Parkinsonian Balance Deficits Quantified Using a Game Industry Board and a Specific Battery of Four Paradigms. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 10. 431–431. 5 indexed citations
5.
Glasgow, LaShawn, Elizabeth Adams, Laurel Curry, et al.. (2016). Using a Theory of Change to Guide Grant Monitoring and Grantmaking. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 23(2). 126–130. 4 indexed citations
6.
Darbin, Olivier, et al.. (2013). An Entropy-Based Model for Basal Ganglia Dysfunctions in Movement Disorders. BioMed Research International. 2013. 1–5. 24 indexed citations
7.
Darbin, Olivier, et al.. (2013). Non-Linear Dynamics in Parkinsonism. Frontiers in Neurology. 4. 211–211. 26 indexed citations
8.
Singh, Manpreet K., Daniel M. Spielman, Elizabeth Adams, et al.. (2011). Neurochemical deficits in the cerebellar vermis in child offspring of parents with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders. 13(2). 189–197. 17 indexed citations
9.
Pears, Arnold, Stephen B. Seidman, Lauri Malmi, et al.. (2007). A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 39(4). 204–223. 313 indexed citations
10.
Adams, Elizabeth, et al.. (2004). Making program grading easier: but not totally automatic. Journal of computing sciences in colleges. 20(1). 248–261. 12 indexed citations
11.
Adams, Elizabeth, et al.. (2004). Managing the introductory database course. 497–498. 6 indexed citations
12.
Lister, Raymond, Elizabeth Adams, Sue Fitzgerald, et al.. (2004). A multi-national study of reading and tracing skills in novice programmers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 36(4). 119–150. 388 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Little, Joyce Currie, Mary J. Granger, Elizabeth Adams, et al.. (2001). Integrating cultural issues into the computer and information technology curriculum. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 33(2). 136–154. 8 indexed citations
14.
Adams, Elizabeth, et al.. (2000). Teaching software testing throughout the curriculum. Journal of computing sciences in colleges. 15(5). 178–180. 1 indexed citations
15.
Fincher, Sally, et al.. (1999). The Peer Review Process of Teaching Materials. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 31(4). 87–100. 3 indexed citations
16.
Gal‐Ezer, Judith, et al.. (1997). Distance education (panel). 369–370. 1 indexed citations
17.
Impagliazzo, John, et al.. (1996). Proceedings of the twenty-seventh SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. 3 indexed citations
18.
Adams, Elizabeth, et al.. (1996). Interactive multimedia pedagogies. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 28(SI). 182–191. 7 indexed citations
19.
Adams, Elizabeth & Mary W. Gray. (1987). Strict Liability for the Malfunction of a Medical Expert System. PubMed Central. 93–99. 2 indexed citations
20.
Adams, Elizabeth, et al.. (1975). In-service education and teachers' centres. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026