Neurology
- Topics
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatments
In The Last Decade
Neurology
213.3k papers receiving 2.6M citations
Countries where authors publish papers about Neurology
This map shows the geographic impact of research in Neurology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Neurology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers about Neurology
This network shows the impact of papers covering Neurology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Neurology.
About Neurology
1.1M papers covering Neurology have received a total of 25.7M indexed citations since 1950 . Papers on Neurology are most often about the specific topic of Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments and Neurological disorders and treatments and also cover the fields of Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Papers citing work on Neurology are usually about Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health. Some of the most active scholars covering Neurology are Joseph Jankovic, Andrew J. Lees, Anthony E. Lang, K. A. Jellinger, C. D. Marsden, Urban Ungerstedt, Anthony H.V. Schapira, John Q. Trojanowski, Mahlon R. DeLong and C. Warren Olanow.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.