Dragoş Iliescu

3.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
119 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Dragoş Iliescu is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Dragoş Iliescu has authored 119 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Social Psychology, 34 papers in Clinical Psychology and 34 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Dragoş Iliescu's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (32 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (20 papers) and Emotional Intelligence and Performance (14 papers). Dragoş Iliescu is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (32 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (20 papers) and Emotional Intelligence and Performance (14 papers). Dragoş Iliescu collaborates with scholars based in Romania, United States and South Africa. Dragoş Iliescu's co-authors include Samuel Greiff, Mark S. Allen, Bogdan Oprea, Dan Ispas, Alexandra Ilie, Coralia Șulea, Hans De Witte, Gabriel Fischmann, Delia Vîrgă and Andrei Rusu and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Business Ethics.

In The Last Decade

Dragoş Iliescu

108 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

Single Item Measures in P... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dragoş Iliescu Romania 21 689 671 463 461 403 119 2.0k
Matthew J. Grawitch United States 21 875 1.3× 727 1.1× 396 0.9× 646 1.4× 442 1.1× 38 2.2k
Gavin R. Slemp Australia 17 902 1.3× 708 1.1× 307 0.7× 264 0.6× 267 0.7× 39 1.8k
Delia Vîrgă Romania 21 714 1.0× 704 1.0× 450 1.0× 319 0.7× 353 0.9× 88 1.6k
Lisa E. Baranik United States 20 957 1.4× 562 0.8× 558 1.2× 432 0.9× 266 0.7× 33 1.9k
Karen Niven United Kingdom 26 1.0k 1.5× 697 1.0× 608 1.3× 767 1.7× 284 0.7× 66 2.1k
Phillip W. Braddy United States 19 786 1.1× 880 1.3× 670 1.4× 810 1.8× 271 0.7× 29 2.7k
Emily Heaphy United States 17 909 1.3× 989 1.5× 485 1.0× 494 1.1× 237 0.6× 29 2.3k
Martin Kleinmann Switzerland 28 703 1.0× 1.0k 1.5× 527 1.1× 662 1.4× 238 0.6× 92 2.1k
Carolyn M. Youssef‐Morgan United States 13 1.2k 1.7× 826 1.2× 715 1.5× 241 0.5× 317 0.8× 16 2.3k
Wido G. M. Oerlemans Netherlands 22 1.1k 1.6× 1.0k 1.5× 369 0.8× 487 1.1× 535 1.3× 32 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Dragoş Iliescu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dragoş Iliescu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dragoş Iliescu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dragoş Iliescu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dragoş Iliescu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dragoş Iliescu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dragoş Iliescu. The network helps show where Dragoş Iliescu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dragoş Iliescu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dragoş Iliescu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dragoş Iliescu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dragoş Iliescu. Dragoş Iliescu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nolan, Susan A., Jacquelyn Cranney, Susanne Narciss, et al.. (2025). International competences for undergraduate psychology: Relevance to the United Nations sustainable development goals.. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne. 66(4). 285–295.
2.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2025). ChatGPT-Assisted Decision-Making: An In-Depth Exploration of the Human–AI Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 41(24). 15584–15599. 2 indexed citations
3.
Cranney, Jacquelyn, Susan A. Nolan, Julie A. Hulme, et al.. (2025). Considering cultural responsiveness in the creation of the International Competences for Undergraduate Psychology (ICUP) model: What can psychology learn?. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 1 indexed citations
4.
Petre, D., et al.. (2024). From Hassles to Well‐Being: Unravelling the Mediating Role of Daily Affect. Stress and Health. 41(2). e3518–e3518.
5.
Iliescu, Dragoş, Samuel Greiff, & Andrei Rusu. (2024). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Psychological Assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 40(5). 341–342.
6.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2023). Psychometric Characteristics of the Romanian Adaptation of the GAD-7. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 45(3). 691–701. 5 indexed citations
7.
Allen, Mark S., Dragoş Iliescu, & Samuel Greiff. (2023). Direct Replication in Psychological Assessment Research. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 39(1). 1–4. 3 indexed citations
8.
Allen, Mark S., Davina A. Robson, & Dragoş Iliescu. (2023). Face Validity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 39(3). 153–156. 24 indexed citations
9.
Röhner, Jessica & Dragoş Iliescu. (2023). On the Death of Implicit Association Tests (IATs). European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 39(5). 317–322. 4 indexed citations
10.
Petre, D., et al.. (2022). Secular changes in personality: An age-period-cohort analysis. Journal of Research in Personality. 100. 104280–104280. 2 indexed citations
11.
Zeinoun, Pia, et al.. (2021). Psychological Tests in Arabic: A Review of Methodological Practices and Recommendations for Future Use. Neuropsychology Review. 32(1). 1–19. 10 indexed citations
12.
Oprea, Bogdan, Dragoş Iliescu, & Hans De Witte. (2021). Romanian Short Version of the Burnout Assessment Tool: Psychometric Properties. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 44(4). 406–415. 24 indexed citations
13.
Fischmann, Gabriel, Hans De Witte, Coralia Șulea, & Dragoş Iliescu. (2018). Qualitative job insecurity and in-role performance: a bidirectional longitudinal relationship?. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 27(5). 603–615. 36 indexed citations
14.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2017). Work-life interaction as a mediator between work factors and outcomes. 15(2). 106–124. 2 indexed citations
15.
Oprea, Bogdan & Dragoş Iliescu. (2015). Burnout and job insecurity: the mediating role of job crafting. 13(2). 232–244. 13 indexed citations
16.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2014). Adaptarea culturală a scalei Satisfacerea nevoilor psihologice la locul de muncă în context românesc. 12(2). 130–146. 1 indexed citations
17.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2013). The structure of vocational interests in Romania.. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 60(2). 294–302. 12 indexed citations
18.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2012). Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Mayer-Salovey- Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 29(2). 121–128. 19 indexed citations
19.
20.
Pitariu, Horia & Dragoş Iliescu. (2004). California Psychological Inventory – CPI 260-RO. 2(1). 40. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026