Dan Ispas

944 total citations
28 papers, 614 citations indexed

About

Dan Ispas is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dan Ispas has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 614 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Social Psychology, 13 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 8 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Dan Ispas's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (9 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (7 papers). Dan Ispas is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (9 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (7 papers). Dan Ispas collaborates with scholars based in United States, Romania and South Africa. Dan Ispas's co-authors include Dragoş Iliescu, Alexandra Ilie, Edward L. Levine, Eric D. Wesselmann, Kristen M. Shockley, Eros DeSouza, Coralia Șulea, Liu‐Qin Yang, Kevin W. Mossholder and Russell E. Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Business Ethics.

In The Last Decade

Dan Ispas

26 papers receiving 563 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dan Ispas United States 14 289 258 200 141 96 28 614
Kenneth Tai Singapore 12 388 1.3× 284 1.1× 355 1.8× 113 0.8× 82 0.9× 16 768
Dina Krasikova United States 8 361 1.2× 434 1.7× 225 1.1× 233 1.7× 106 1.1× 14 832
Markku Jokisaari Finland 14 188 0.7× 271 1.1× 170 0.8× 70 0.5× 61 0.6× 20 610
Lawrence Houston United States 10 227 0.8× 351 1.4× 254 1.3× 90 0.6× 74 0.8× 24 653
Nicole M. Dudley United States 6 252 0.9× 298 1.2× 148 0.7× 253 1.8× 98 1.0× 8 632
Byron G. Adams Netherlands 15 232 0.8× 158 0.6× 237 1.2× 130 0.9× 45 0.5× 34 617
Jordan M. Robbins United States 4 280 1.0× 191 0.7× 335 1.7× 76 0.5× 88 0.9× 7 722
Ding–Yu Jiang Taiwan 10 300 1.0× 301 1.2× 166 0.8× 79 0.6× 37 0.4× 15 602
Hoda Vaziri United States 10 364 1.3× 436 1.7× 471 2.4× 137 1.0× 48 0.5× 22 850

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Ispas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Ispas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Ispas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Ispas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Ispas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Ispas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Ispas. The network helps show where Dan Ispas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Ispas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Ispas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Ispas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Ispas. Dan Ispas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lannin, Daniel G., et al.. (2025). Unmonitored Online Exams: Valid Assessment or Score Inflation?. Teaching of Psychology. 53(1). 4–11.
2.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2023). The incremental validity of personality over time in predicting job performance, voluntary turnover, and career success in high-stakes contexts- A longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences. 213. 112288–112288. 2 indexed citations
3.
Ispas, Dan & Walter C. Borman. (2020). Beyond task performance: the concept of organizational citizenship performance. 6(1). 12–18. 1 indexed citations
4.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2020). Cultural adaptation of MAB-II (Multidimensional Aptitude Battery) in Romania. 7(1). 75–87. 1 indexed citations
5.
Ispas, Dan & Walter C. Borman. (2020). Beyond task performance: the concept of organizational citizenship performance. 6(1). 12–18. 1 indexed citations
6.
Wesselmann, Eric D., et al.. (2018). Does perceived ostracism contribute to mental health concerns among veterans who have been deployed?. PLoS ONE. 13(12). e0208438–e0208438. 19 indexed citations
7.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2016). The emic–etic approach to personality measurement in personnel selection. Personality and Individual Differences. 97. 55–60. 6 indexed citations
8.
Iliescu, Dragoş, Alexandra Ilie, Dan Ispas, Anca Dobrean, & Aurel Ion Clinciu. (2016). Sex differences in intelligence: A multi-measure approach using nationally representative samples from Romania. Intelligence. 58. 54–61. 13 indexed citations
9.
10.
Iliescu, Dragoş, Dan Ispas, Coralia Șulea, & Alexandra Ilie. (2014). Vocational fit and counterproductive work behaviors: A self-regulation perspective.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 100(1). 21–39. 45 indexed citations
11.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2013). The structure of vocational interests in Romania.. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 60(2). 294–302. 12 indexed citations
12.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2012). Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Mayer-Salovey- Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 29(2). 121–128. 19 indexed citations
13.
Shockley, Kristen M., et al.. (2012). A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Relationship Between State Affect, Discrete Emotions, and Job Performance. Human Performance. 25(5). 377–411. 118 indexed citations
14.
Iliescu, Dragoş, et al.. (2012). Emotional Intelligence in Personnel Selection: Applicant reactions, criterion, and incremental validity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 20(3). 347–358. 15 indexed citations
15.
Levine, Edward L., Xian Xu, Liu‐Qin Yang, et al.. (2011). Cross-National Explorations of the Impact of Affect at Work Using the State-Trait Emotion Measure: A Coordinated Series of Studies in the United States, China, and Romania. Human Performance. 24(5). 405–442. 31 indexed citations
16.
Ilie, Alexandra, Lisa M. Penney, Dan Ispas, & Dragoş Iliescu. (2011). The Role of Trait Anger in the Relationship between Stressors and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Convergent Findings from Multiple Studies and Methodologies. Applied Psychology. 61(3). 415–436. 30 indexed citations
17.
Ispas, Dan. (2010). The Role of Rater Motivation in Personnel Selection Validation Studies. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 1 indexed citations
18.
Harris, Michael M., et al.. (2008). Inaccurate Performance Ratings Are a Reflection of Larger Organizational Issues. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 1(2). 190–193. 6 indexed citations
19.
Francis, Leslie J., Dan Ispas, Mandy Robbins, Alexandra Ilie, & Dragoş Iliescu. (2008). The Romanian Translation of the Francis Scale of Attitude Toward Christianity: Internal Consistency Reliability, Re-test Reliability and Construct Validity Among Undergraduate Students Within a Greek Orthodox Culture. Pastoral Psychology. 58(1). 49–54. 29 indexed citations
20.
Yang, Liu‐Qin, et al.. (2008). Person–environment fit or person plus environment: A meta-analysis of studies using polynomial regression analysis. Human Resource Management Review. 18(4). 311–321. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026