Daniel Ferguson

438 total citations
54 papers, 276 citations indexed

About

Daniel Ferguson is a scholar working on Media Technology, Education and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Ferguson has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 276 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Media Technology, 14 papers in Education and 11 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel Ferguson's work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (16 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (9 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (8 papers). Daniel Ferguson is often cited by papers focused on Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (16 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (9 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (8 papers). Daniel Ferguson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Iran. Daniel Ferguson's co-authors include Matthew Ohland, Kenneth Reid, Kathryn Jablokow, Şenay Purzer, Misty L. Loughry, David J. Woehr, Andrew C. Loignon, Benjamin Ahn, Frederick Berry and Margaret Huyck and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Academy of Management Learning and Education and Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Ferguson

47 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Ferguson United States	10	120	88	72	51	38	54	276
Douglas G. Schmucker United States	5	147 1.2×	162 1.8×	58 0.8×	53 1.0×	59 1.6×	12	427
Nicholas Fila United States	10	128 1.1×	152 1.7×	117 1.6×	109 2.1×	41 1.1×	53	388
Samantha Brunhaver United States	12	166 1.4×	160 1.8×	67 0.9×	31 0.6×	50 1.3×	70	362
Hal Pomeranz United States	4	166 1.4×	177 2.0×	71 1.0×	40 0.8×	64 1.7×	16	436
Llewellyn Mann Australia	8	124 1.0×	161 1.8×	67 0.9×	129 2.5×	23 0.6×	36	359
Chris Swan United States	10	183 1.5×	201 2.3×	73 1.0×	78 1.5×	55 1.4×	67	418
Penny Hirsch United States	9	201 1.7×	141 1.6×	67 0.9×	68 1.3×	70 1.8×	26	326
Michael Alley United States	10	111 0.9×	141 1.6×	41 0.6×	27 0.5×	66 1.7×	68	454
Stephanie Cutler United States	10	228 1.9×	310 3.5×	81 1.1×	36 0.7×	40 1.1×	54	500
Homero Murzi United States	11	142 1.2×	143 1.6×	50 0.7×	34 0.7×	25 0.7×	81	307

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Ferguson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Ferguson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Ferguson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Ferguson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Ferguson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Ferguson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Ferguson. The network helps show where Daniel Ferguson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Ferguson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Ferguson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Ferguson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Ferguson. Daniel Ferguson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Liss, Kim, et al.. (2025). Inhibition of Adipocyte Lipolysis Reduces Liver Injury in a Mouse Model of Ischemia Reperfusion Injury. Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 20(3). 101679–101679.

Jablokow, Kathryn, et al.. (2020). A Critical Review of Measures of Innovativeness. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 24.41.1–24.41.19. 6 indexed citations

Ohland, Matthew, et al.. (2020). The Effect of Different Dimensions of Conflict on Measures of Team-member Effectiveness. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. 2 indexed citations

Ohland, Matthew, Richard A. Layton, Daniel Ferguson, et al.. (2020). SMARTER Teamwork: System for Management, Assessment, Research, Training, Education, and Remediation for Teamwork. 22.1303.1–22.1303.10. 1 indexed citations

Ferguson, Daniel, et al.. (2020). Exploratory Analysis Of Effectiveness Of Assessment Tools On Project Based Interprofessional Education. 10.615.1–10.615.8. 1 indexed citations

Ferguson, Daniel, et al.. (2020). How Competent are Freshman Engineering Students in Constructively Rating Their Peers in a Team Context?. 1 indexed citations

Ohland, Matthew, et al.. (2020). Optimizing Student Team Skill Development Using Evidence-based Strategies: Year 5. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. 1 indexed citations

Ferguson, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Examining the Effect of a Game-like Practice Tool on the Quality of Student Peer Evaluations. 2. 1–4. 1 indexed citations

Ferguson, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Evaluating the effect of different teamwork training interventions on the quality of peer evaluations. 2. 1–5. 5 indexed citations

10.

Ferguson, Daniel, et al.. (2017). The diverse personas of engineering innovators. 33(1). 19–29. 10 indexed citations

11.

Jablokow, Kathryn, et al.. (2016). The characteristics of engineering innovativeness: a cognitive mapping and review of instruments. International journal of engineering education. 32(1). 64–83. 13 indexed citations

12.

Ferguson, Daniel. (2016). The Gamification of Legal Education: Why Games Transcend the Langdellian Model and How They Can Revolutionize Law School. Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University). 19(2). 629. 1 indexed citations

13.

Ohland, Matthew, Misty L. Loughry, David J. Woehr, Richard A. Layton, & Daniel Ferguson. (2015). Optimizing Student Team Skill Development Using Evidence-Based Strategies. 1 indexed citations

14.

Ohland, Matthew, Misty L. Loughry, Richard A. Layton, David J. Woehr, & Daniel Ferguson. (2015). The Rapid Adoption of SMARTER Teamwork Tools: the System for Management, Assessment, Research, Training, Education, and Remediation for Teamwork. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 26.1566.1–26.1566.6. 1 indexed citations

15.

Reid, Kenneth & Daniel Ferguson. (2014). Do design experiences in engineering build a “growth mindset” in students?. 1–5. 10 indexed citations

16.

Ferguson, Daniel. (2013). How engineering innovators characterize engineering innovativeness: A qualitative study. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 5 indexed citations

17.

Ferguson, Daniel & Matthew Ohland. (2012). What is engineering innovativeness. International journal of engineering education. 28(2). 253–262. 38 indexed citations

18.

Reid, Kenneth & Daniel Ferguson. (2011). Work in progress — Enhancing the entrepreneurial mindset of freshman engineers. F2D–1. 12 indexed citations

19.

Wright, Logan & Daniel Ferguson. (2001). Process redesign in the clinical laboratory: a success story.. PubMed. 33(1). 34–41. 2 indexed citations

20.

Kurtz, Margot E., et al.. (1990). How effectively are osteopathic medical students coping with a stressful life-style?. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 90(7). 613–626. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact