This map shows the geographic impact of Greg Strimel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg Strimel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg Strimel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg Strimel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg Strimel. The network helps show where Greg Strimel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Greg Strimel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Greg Strimel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Greg Strimel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Greg Strimel. Greg Strimel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bartholomew, Scott, et al.. (2020). using data to improve precision in crop fertilization through digital agriculture. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 79(7). 32–36.1 indexed citations
Bartholomew, Scott, et al.. (2019). Teaching Engineering Concepts through Socially Relevant Contexts: Serving the Homeless with Smart Tiny Homes.. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 78(7). 24–27.1 indexed citations
8.
Waldrop, Angela E., et al.. (2019). Engineering in Athletics: Teaching Material Selection and the Application of Dynamics for Designing Head Protection.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 78(4). 31–38.
9.
Strimel, Greg, et al.. (2019). Excelling in Engineering: Integrating Computational Thinking through Wearable Technologies and Programmable E-Textiles.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 78(8). 16–19.2 indexed citations
Strimel, Greg, Scott Bartholomew, & W. Andrew Jackson. (2018). A comparison of traditional and adaptive comparative judgment assessment techniques for freshmen engineering design projects. International journal of engineering education. 34(1). 20–33.19 indexed citations
12.
Strimel, Greg, et al.. (2018). A Well-Maintained Lab Is a Safer Lab.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 77(6). 16–19.1 indexed citations
13.
Strimel, Greg, et al.. (2018). Examining Engineering Design Cognition with Respect to Student Experience and Performance. International journal of engineering education. 34(6). 1910–1929.7 indexed citations
14.
Bosman, Lisa, et al.. (2018). Validating the Value Proposition of Engineering Design Problems through Quantitative Analysis.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 78(2). 32–37.1 indexed citations
15.
Strimel, Greg, et al.. (2018). Engineering Education: A Clear Content Base for Standards.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 77(7). 32–38.4 indexed citations
16.
Strimel, Greg, et al.. (2017). Mason Bee Habitations: Teaching Proper "Making" Skill through Authentic Engineering Design Contests. Resources in Technology and Engineering.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 76(8). 20–25.1 indexed citations
17.
Strimel, Greg, et al.. (2017). Engineering Education: A Clear Decision.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 76(4). 18–24.11 indexed citations
Strimel, Greg. (2014). Authentic Education by Providing a Situation for Student-Selected Problem-Based Learning.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 73(7). 8–18.6 indexed citations
20.
Love, Tyler S. & Greg Strimel. (2013). An Elementary Approach to Teaching Wind Power.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 72(4). 8–14.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.