Countries where authors publish in Engineering Studies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Engineering Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Engineering Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Engineering Studies more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Engineering Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Engineering Studies.
About Engineering Studies
The 230 papers published in Engineering Studies in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Engineering Studies usually cover Architecture (17 papers), Media Technology (65 papers), Human Factors and Ergonomics (12 papers), Information Systems and Management (32 papers) and Safety Research (36 papers) specifically the topics of Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (65 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (36 papers), Career Development and Diversity (34 papers), Design Education and Practice (31 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (27 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (19 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (17 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Engineering Studies are Wendy Faulkner, Donna Riley, James Trevelyan, Erin A. Cech, Tom Waidzunas, Dean Nieusma, Gary Lee Downey, Dominique Vinck, Stephen Secules and Carl Mitcham.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.