Political Science and International Relations15.6k
Replace British Journal of Sociology with:
British Journal of SociologyUnited Kingdom
Social ProblemsUnited States
American Journal of SociologyUnited States
Journal of Business EthicsUnited States
Journal of Social IssuesUnited States
American Behavioral ScientistUnited States
Social ForcesUnited States
Review of Religious ResearchUnited States
SociologyUnited Kingdom
Journal of American HistoryUnited States
British Journal of SociologyUnited KingdomView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · 1×
×1.3115.1kSPS
×0.18.1kHEALT
×0.616.6kSP
×0.714.2kCP
×2.742.3kPSIR
Citations per year, relative to Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.