This map shows the geographic impact of Som Naidu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Som Naidu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Som Naidu more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Som Naidu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Som Naidu. The network helps show where Som Naidu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Som Naidu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Som Naidu.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Som Naidu based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Som Naidu. Som Naidu is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
White, Paul J., Ian Larson, Elizabeth Yuriev, et al.. (2015). Using active learning strategies to shift student attitudes and behaviours about learning and teaching in a research intensive educational context. Pharmacy Education. 15(1). 116–126.18 indexed citations
9.
Malone, Daniel T., Jennifer L. Short, Som Naidu, Paul J. White, & Carl M. J. Kirkpatrick. (2015). Mapping of the Australian Qualifications Framework Standards onto an undergraduate Bachelor of Pharmacy course. Pharmacy Education. 15(1). 261–269.7 indexed citations
10.
Jona, Kemi & Som Naidu. (2014). MOOCs: emerging research. Distance Education. 35(2). 141–144.27 indexed citations
11.
Yuen, S.T.S. & Som Naidu. (2007). Using multimedia to close the gap between theory and practice in engineering education. International journal of engineering education. 23(3). 536–544.7 indexed citations
12.
Naidu, Som & Mary Oliver. (2007). Computer-supported Collaborative Problem-based Learning:. International journal of e-learning & distance education. 11(2). 1–22.1 indexed citations
13.
Lindsay, Euan, Som Naidu, & M C Good. (2007). A different kind of difference: theoretical implications of using technology to overcome separation in remote laboratories. International journal of engineering education. 23(4). 772–779.24 indexed citations
14.
Naidu, Som & David Cunnington. (2004). Showcasing Faculty Experiences with Technology Enhanced Teaching and Learning. 12(2). 141–154.2 indexed citations
15.
Naidu, Som. (2004). Trends in faculty use and perceptions of e-Learning. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 2(2). 1–9.9 indexed citations
16.
Naidu, Som. (2003). Designing instruction for e-learning. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).5 indexed citations
17.
Naidu, Som, et al.. (2002). The Experience of Practitioners with Technology-Enhanced Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology & Society. 5(1). 23–34.16 indexed citations
18.
Naidu, Som, et al.. (2000). Dynamic Goal-Based Role-Play Simulation on the Web: A Case Study. Educational Technology & Society. 3(3).39 indexed citations
19.
Naidu, Som. (2000). Book review: 'Collaboration: how to find, design and implement collaborative internet projects', by Betsy Burgess and Patricia Robertson. Educational Technology & Society. 3(2). 108.5 indexed citations
20.
Naidu, Som, et al.. (1996). Making the Most of Practical Experience in Teacher Education With Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 2(4). 265–278.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.