Scott Sterling

441 citations
17 papers · 186 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Sterling

15 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers

Scott Sterling
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Language and Linguistics 58
  • Literature and Literary Theory 54
  • Linguistics and Language 13
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 26
Replace Salim Razı with:
Salim Razı Türkiye
Mya Poe United States
Mohamad Khatib Iran
Sarah Huffman United States
Vicki Spandel United States
Christina Sanchez‐Stockhammer Germany
Deborah J. Crusan United States
Veronika Timpe‐Laughlin United States
Zhang Yan China
Peichin Chang Taiwan
Scott Sterling relative to Salim Razı Türkiye Salim Razı's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Salim Razı · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Sterling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Sterling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Sterling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Sterling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Sterling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Sterling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Sterling. The network helps show where Scott Sterling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Scott Sterling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Sterling Line = papers co-authored together Scott Sterling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201346
2 202032
3 202324
4 202323
5 201716
6 202215
7 20158
8 20247
9 20234
10
An Evaluation of Three Material Models Used in the Finite Element Simulation of a Sheet Stretching Process
20003
11 20183
12 20002
13
Structural-Aerodynamic Coupling For Wells Turbine Blades
19991
14
Aeroelastic divergence investigation of a wells turbine blade
20001
15 20171
16 20250
17 20250

About Scott Sterling

Scott Sterling is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Language and Linguistics, Mechanics of Materials, Safety Research and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 186 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (5 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Metallurgy and Material Forming (3 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers), Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (2 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (8 citations), Language and Linguistics (58 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (54 citations), Linguistics and Language (13 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (26 citations). Scott Sterling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Tove Larsson, Luke Plonsky, Merja Kytö, Shawn Loewen, Susan M. Gass, Dominik Wolff, Mostafa Papi, Peter I. De Costa, Wendy Li and Hima Rawal. Their work appears in journals such as Language Teaching, System, TESOL Quarterly, Journal of Materials Processing Technology and Research Methods in Applied Linguistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact