Luke Plonsky

12.0k total citations · 6 hit papers
99 papers, 6.8k citations indexed

About

Luke Plonsky is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Luke Plonsky has authored 99 papers receiving a total of 6.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Language and Linguistics, 41 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 35 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Luke Plonsky's work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (39 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (32 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (27 papers). Luke Plonsky is often cited by papers focused on EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (39 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (32 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (27 papers). Luke Plonsky collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Luke Plonsky's co-authors include Frederick L. Oswald, Susan M. Gass, Yasser Teimouri, Jennifer Behney, Larry Selinker, Julia Goetze, Hessameddin Ghanbar, Kazuya Saito, Shawn Loewen and Junkyu Lee and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Modern Language Journal and TESOL Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Luke Plonsky

91 papers receiving 6.4k citations

Hit Papers

How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research 2013 2026 2017 2021 2014 2019 2020 2013 2023 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Luke Plonsky United States 42 3.6k 2.8k 2.0k 1.1k 1.0k 99 6.8k
Lawrence Jun Zhang New Zealand 46 3.7k 1.0× 3.1k 1.1× 2.4k 1.2× 671 0.6× 360 0.3× 279 7.7k
Alison Mackey United States 45 7.5k 2.1× 4.7k 1.7× 5.2k 2.6× 856 0.8× 619 0.6× 110 9.8k
Diane L. Schallert United States 36 1.3k 0.4× 2.4k 0.9× 744 0.4× 1.3k 1.2× 432 0.4× 118 5.6k
Michael H. Long United States 38 7.0k 2.0× 4.1k 1.5× 4.6k 2.3× 1.0k 0.9× 754 0.7× 82 9.1k
M.A.K. Halliday Australia 14 3.3k 0.9× 1.5k 0.6× 3.4k 1.7× 1.3k 1.1× 754 0.7× 23 7.5k
Lyle F. Bachman United States 29 5.2k 1.5× 2.7k 1.0× 3.5k 1.8× 425 0.4× 717 0.7× 60 8.1k
Susan M. Gass United States 53 10.3k 2.9× 6.2k 2.2× 5.9k 3.0× 1.8k 1.6× 1.3k 1.3× 142 13.5k
James P. Lantolf United States 38 5.8k 1.6× 4.7k 1.7× 3.8k 1.9× 685 0.6× 265 0.3× 108 9.6k
P. David Pearson United States 44 1.4k 0.4× 6.8k 2.5× 1.4k 0.7× 656 0.6× 699 0.7× 205 10.0k
Lorenza Mondada France 37 4.1k 1.1× 708 0.3× 1.7k 0.8× 2.2k 1.9× 366 0.4× 242 5.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Plonsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Plonsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Plonsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Plonsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Plonsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Plonsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Plonsky. The network helps show where Luke Plonsky may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Plonsky

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Plonsky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Plonsky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Plonsky. Luke Plonsky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sterling, Scott, et al.. (2025). Investigating researcher perceptions of Questionable Research Practices. 8(2). 219–243.
2.
3.
Sudina, Ekaterina, Yasser Teimouri, & Luke Plonsky. (2025). L2 grit and age as predictors of attrition in mobile-assisted language learning. Learning and Individual Differences. 120. 102704–102704.
4.
Teimouri, Yasser, Ekaterina Sudina, & Luke Plonsky. (2025). Individual differences in language learning and teaching: Growing pains at the theory-methods interface. Learning and Individual Differences. 124. 102786–102786.
5.
Plonsky, Luke, et al.. (2024). “Significance sells”: Applied linguists’ views on questionable research practices. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. 3(1). 100099–100099. 6 indexed citations
6.
Plonsky, Luke. (2024). A diamond in the rough. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 13. 2 indexed citations
7.
Andringa, Sible, Susan M. Gass, Gregory R. Hancock, et al.. (2023). Discussions on the past, present, and future of quantitative research ethics in applied linguistics. Language Teaching. 56(4). 557–561. 4 indexed citations
8.
Plonsky, Luke, et al.. (2023). Research ethics in applied linguistics. Language Teaching. 56(4). 478–494. 24 indexed citations
9.
Chong, Sin Wang & Luke Plonsky. (2023). A typology of secondary research in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review. 15(4). 1569–1594. 41 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Plonsky, Luke. (2023). Sampling and Generalizability in Lx Research: A Second-Order Synthesis. Languages. 8(1). 75–75. 26 indexed citations
11.
Plonsky, Luke. (2023). Introduction to the special issue on Introducing bibliometrics in applied linguistics. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. 13(4). 721–726. 5 indexed citations
12.
Isbell, Daniel R., et al.. (2022). Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: The Ethics of Quantitative Data Handling and Reporting in Applied Linguistics. Modern Language Journal. 106(1). 172–195. 41 indexed citations
13.
Liu, Meng, Sin Wang Chong, Emma Marsden, et al.. (2022). Open scholarship in applied linguistics: What, why, and how. Language Teaching. 56(3). 432–437. 21 indexed citations
14.
Plonsky, Luke, et al.. (2021). ELICITED IMITATION TASKS AS A MEASURE OF L2 PROFICIENCY. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 44(3). 886–911. 31 indexed citations
15.
Brown, Alan V., Luke Plonsky, & Yasser Teimouri. (2018). The use of course grades as metrics in L2 research: A systematic review. Foreign Language Annals. 51(4). 763–778. 34 indexed citations
16.
Plonsky, Luke & Hessameddin Ghanbar. (2018). Multiple Regression in L2 Research: A Methodological Synthesis and Guide to InterpretingR2Values. Modern Language Journal. 102(4). 713–731. 214 indexed citations
17.
Plonsky, Luke & Talip Gönülal. (2015). Methodological Synthesis in Quantitative L2 Research: A Review of Reviews and a Case Study of Exploratory Factor Analysis. Language Learning. 65(S1). 9–36. 98 indexed citations
18.
Plonsky, Luke & Frederick L. Oswald. (2014). How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research. Language Learning. 64(4). 878–912. 1266 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Plonsky, Luke. (2014). Study Quality in Quantitative L2 Research (1990–2010): A Methodological Synthesis and Call for Reform. Modern Language Journal. 98(1). 450–470. 132 indexed citations
20.
Plonsky, Luke, et al.. (2006). An exploratory study of differing perceptions of error correction between a teacher and students: Bridging the gap. UCL Discovery (University College London). 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026