Sarah Gielen

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
38 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Sarah Gielen is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Gielen has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Education, 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 4 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in Sarah Gielen's work include Student Assessment and Feedback (10 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (8 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (8 papers). Sarah Gielen is often cited by papers focused on Student Assessment and Feedback (10 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (8 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (8 papers). Sarah Gielen collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, China and Poland. Sarah Gielen's co-authors include Filip Dochy, Katrien Struyven, Patrick Onghena, Elien Peeters, Steven B. Janssens, Chloé Meredith, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Stijn Smeets, Eva Kyndt and Machteld Vandecandelaere and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Teaching and Teacher Education and Learning and Instruction.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Gielen

33 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Improving the effectivene... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Gielen Belgium 17 1.2k 359 126 101 97 38 1.4k
Raymond J. Wlodkowski United States 18 899 0.8× 228 0.6× 156 1.2× 73 0.7× 73 0.8× 29 1.3k
Marlies Baeten Belgium 13 1.1k 1.0× 272 0.8× 156 1.2× 103 1.0× 108 1.1× 22 1.4k
Lyn Gow Australia 15 1.5k 1.3× 401 1.1× 162 1.3× 86 0.9× 79 0.8× 36 1.8k
Teresa Duncan United States 7 1.2k 1.0× 609 1.7× 216 1.7× 89 0.9× 100 1.0× 8 1.6k
Robert A. Ellis Australia 20 1.1k 0.9× 339 0.9× 131 1.0× 158 1.6× 245 2.5× 32 1.4k
Dannelle D. Stevens United States 13 727 0.6× 362 1.0× 57 0.5× 69 0.7× 48 0.5× 36 975
Berry O’Donovan United Kingdom 13 1.8k 1.5× 286 0.8× 56 0.4× 92 0.9× 123 1.3× 16 2.0k
Pamela R. Aschbacher United States 15 1.0k 0.9× 363 1.0× 112 0.9× 46 0.5× 66 0.7× 23 1.4k
Bob Köster Netherlands 14 1.6k 1.4× 301 0.8× 147 1.2× 167 1.7× 59 0.6× 25 1.9k
Holbrook Mahn 6 832 0.7× 530 1.5× 90 0.7× 84 0.8× 64 0.7× 9 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Gielen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Gielen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Gielen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Gielen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Gielen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Gielen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Gielen. The network helps show where Sarah Gielen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Gielen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Gielen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Gielen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Gielen. Sarah Gielen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Meredith, Chloé, et al.. (2022). The importance of a collaborative culture for teachers’ job satisfaction and affective commitment. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 38(1). 43–62. 30 indexed citations
2.
Meredith, Chloé, et al.. (2019). ‘Burnout contagion’ among teachers: A social network approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 93(2). 328–352. 65 indexed citations
3.
Hannes, Karin, et al.. (2017). Teacher Leadership in Practice: Mapping the Negotiation of the Position of the Special Educational Needs Coordinator in Schools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 62(5). 701–718. 17 indexed citations
4.
Meredith, Chloé, et al.. (2017). The measurement of collaborative culture in secondary schools: An informal subgroup approach. Frontline Learning Research. 5(2). 24–35. 13 indexed citations
5.
Desmet, Piet, et al.. (2016). Learner motivation in a French L2 context: Teacher motivational practices and student attitudes in relation to proficiency. 13(13). 93–126.
6.
Ning, Bo, Jan Van Damme, Sarah Gielen, Gudrun Vanlaar, & Wim Van Den Noortgate. (2015). What Makes the Difference in Reading Achievement? Comparisons Between Finland and Shanghai. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 60(5). 515–537. 14 indexed citations
7.
Ning, Bo, Jan Van Damme, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Xiangdong Yang, & Sarah Gielen. (2015). The influence of classroom disciplinary climate of schools on reading achievement: a cross-country comparative study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 26(4). 586–611. 67 indexed citations
8.
Gielen, Sarah, et al.. (2014). A country level longitudinal study on the effect of student age, class size and socio-economic status - based on PIRLS 2001, 2006 & 2011. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1 indexed citations
9.
Liu, Hongqiang, et al.. (2014). A cross-country comparison of the effect of family social capital on reading literacy, based on PISA 2009. Lirias (KU Leuven).
10.
Meredith, Chloé, et al.. (2014). Who am I and where do I belong? The perception and evaluation of teacher leaders concerning teacher leadership practices and micropolitics in schools. Journal of Educational Change. 15(2). 203–230. 36 indexed citations
11.
Belfi, Barbara, Sarah Gielen, Bieke De Fraine, Karine Verschueren, & Chloé Meredith. (2014). School-based social capital: The missing link between schools' socioeconomic composition and collective teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education. 45. 33–44. 32 indexed citations
12.
Ning, Bo, Jan Van Damme, Hongqiang Liu, Gudrun Vanlaar, & Sarah Gielen. (2013). Students' Individual Perceptions of School Climate Predict Reading Achievement in Shanghai. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology. 1(3). 188–198. 8 indexed citations
13.
Landeghem, Georges Van, Bieke De Fraine, Sarah Gielen, & Jan Van Damme. (2013). Vroege schoolverlaters in Vlaanderen in 2010. Indeling volgens locatie, opleidingsniveau van de moeder en moedertaal. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1 indexed citations
14.
Damme, Jan Van, et al.. (2013). Sociale ongelijkheid en ongelijkheid op basis van thuistaal inzake wetenschapsprestaties in het Vlaamse onderwijs. Veranderingen tussen 2003 en 2011 op basis van TIMSS, vierde leerjaar. Lirias (KU Leuven). 2 indexed citations
15.
Ning, Bo, Jan Van Damme, Xiangdong Yang, & Sarah Gielen. (2013). Does classroom disciplinary climate in a school matter everywhere? A cross-country comparative study. Lirias (KU Leuven). 3 indexed citations
16.
Gielen, Sarah, et al.. (2010). Peiling wiskunde in het basisonderwijs - Eindrapport. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1 indexed citations
17.
Gielen, Sarah, et al.. (2010). Peiling Frans in het basisonderwijs - Eindrapport. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1 indexed citations
18.
Gielen, Sarah, Elien Peeters, Filip Dochy, Patrick Onghena, & Katrien Struyven. (2009). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction. 20(4). 304–315. 429 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Gielen, Sarah, et al.. (2007). Effects of formative peer-assessment on writing performance: What is the most beneficial role of the assessee?. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1 indexed citations
20.
Gielen, Sarah. (2007). Peer assessment as a tool for learning. Lirias (KU Leuven). 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026