Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
2009429 citationsSarah Gielen, Patrick Onghena et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Onghena
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Onghena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Onghena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Onghena more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Onghena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Onghena. The network helps show where Patrick Onghena may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick Onghena
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick Onghena.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick Onghena based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick Onghena. Patrick Onghena is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gielen, Sarah, et al.. (2014). A country level longitudinal study on the effect of student age, class size and socio-economic status - based on PIRLS 2001, 2006 & 2011. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
Goos, Mieke, Jan Van Damme, Patrick Onghena, & Katja Petry. (2012). First-grade retention, peer relationships, and academic achievement: An analysis of causal mediation effects. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
12.
Goos, Mieke, Jan Van Damme, Patrick Onghena, & Katja Petry. (2011). First-grade retention: Effects on children’s academic and psychosocial growth throughout primary education. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
13.
Goos, Mieke, Jan Van Damme, Patrick Onghena, & Katja Petry. (2011). Zittenblijven in het eerste leerjaar: Zinvol of niet?. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
14.
März, Virginie, Stijn Vanhoof, & Patrick Onghena. (2010). De plaats van statistiek in het onderwijs: in of uit de wiskundeles?. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
15.
Boets, Bart, Astrid Van Wieringen, Patrick Onghena, et al.. (2005). An auditory temporal processing deficit in children with dyslexia?. Lirias (KU Leuven).9 indexed citations
Maes, Frederik, Pol Ghesquière, Patrick Onghena, & Jan Van Damme. (2002). Longitudinaal onderzoek in het basisonderwijs: van doelstellingen tot onderzoeksopzet. Lirias (KU Leuven).5 indexed citations
18.
Damme, Jan Van, Georges Van Landeghem, Patrick Onghena, Bieke De Fraine, & Marie‐Christine Opdenakker. (2001). The effect of schools and classes upon well-being and other non-cognitive outcomes. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.