Chloé Meredith

954 total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 604 citations indexed

About

Chloé Meredith is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Chloé Meredith has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 604 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Education, 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Chloé Meredith's work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (5 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (3 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (3 papers). Chloé Meredith is often cited by papers focused on Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (5 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (3 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (3 papers). Chloé Meredith collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Australia and Netherlands. Chloé Meredith's co-authors include Eva Kyndt, Katrien Vangrieken, Sarah Gielen, Machteld Vandecandelaere, Bieke De Fraine, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Karin Hannes, Nienke Moolenaar, Barbara Belfi and Karine Verschueren and has published in prestigious journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Social Networks.

In The Last Decade

Chloé Meredith

9 papers receiving 551 citations

Hit Papers

Teacher communities as a context for professional develop... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chloé Meredith Belgium 9 445 128 85 77 45 9 604
Ulrika Bergmark Sweden 13 549 1.2× 88 0.7× 112 1.3× 76 1.0× 47 1.0× 38 731
David Mandzuk Canada 12 474 1.1× 78 0.6× 88 1.0× 73 0.9× 38 0.8× 21 610
Jessica Aspfors Norway 12 628 1.4× 128 1.0× 92 1.1× 123 1.6× 30 0.7× 40 748
Richard Sagor United States 9 457 1.0× 133 1.0× 76 0.9× 48 0.6× 37 0.8× 26 644
Ann Webster-Wright Australia 5 604 1.4× 152 1.2× 79 0.9× 43 0.6× 34 0.8× 6 770
Jason Margolis United States 15 675 1.5× 90 0.7× 82 1.0× 35 0.5× 41 0.9× 32 741
Neil Dempster Australia 14 400 0.9× 66 0.5× 56 0.7× 49 0.6× 29 0.6× 51 489
Diane Yendol‐Hoppey United States 17 819 1.8× 147 1.1× 170 2.0× 71 0.9× 32 0.7× 43 1.0k
Mike Coldwell United Kingdom 12 367 0.8× 86 0.7× 55 0.6× 33 0.4× 21 0.5× 33 492
Julianne A. Wenner United States 10 552 1.2× 96 0.8× 69 0.8× 44 0.6× 34 0.8× 28 662

Countries citing papers authored by Chloé Meredith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloé Meredith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloé Meredith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloé Meredith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloé Meredith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloé Meredith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloé Meredith. The network helps show where Chloé Meredith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chloé Meredith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chloé Meredith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chloé Meredith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chloé Meredith. Chloé Meredith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Meredith, Chloé, et al.. (2022). The importance of a collaborative culture for teachers’ job satisfaction and affective commitment. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 38(1). 43–62. 30 indexed citations
2.
Meredith, Chloé, et al.. (2019). ‘Burnout contagion’ among teachers: A social network approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 93(2). 328–352. 65 indexed citations
3.
Hannes, Karin, et al.. (2017). Teacher Leadership in Practice: Mapping the Negotiation of the Position of the Special Educational Needs Coordinator in Schools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 62(5). 701–718. 17 indexed citations
4.
Meredith, Chloé, et al.. (2017). The measurement of collaborative culture in secondary schools: An informal subgroup approach. Frontline Learning Research. 5(2). 24–35. 13 indexed citations
5.
Meredith, Chloé, et al.. (2017). Information seeking in secondary schools: A multilevel network approach. Social Networks. 50. 35–45. 23 indexed citations
6.
Vangrieken, Katrien, et al.. (2016). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education. 61. 47–59. 357 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Daly, Alan J., et al.. (2016). More than a mentor. Journal of Professional Capital and Community. 1(3). 198–218. 31 indexed citations
8.
Meredith, Chloé, et al.. (2014). Who am I and where do I belong? The perception and evaluation of teacher leaders concerning teacher leadership practices and micropolitics in schools. Journal of Educational Change. 15(2). 203–230. 36 indexed citations
9.
Belfi, Barbara, Sarah Gielen, Bieke De Fraine, Karine Verschueren, & Chloé Meredith. (2014). School-based social capital: The missing link between schools' socioeconomic composition and collective teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education. 45. 33–44. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026