Philip M. Reeves

34 total papers · 641 total citations
22 papers, 392 citations indexed

About

Philip M. Reeves is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip M. Reeves has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 392 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Education, 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philip M. Reeves's work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers). Philip M. Reeves is often cited by papers focused on Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers). Philip M. Reeves collaborates with scholars based in United States. Philip M. Reeves's co-authors include Wik Hung Pun, Kyung Sun Chung, Rayne A. Sperling, D. Jake Follmer, Sarah Zappe, F. J. Robinson, Claudia De Grandi, H. Caines, Derek Dube and Mark Graham and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Teaching and Teacher Education and British Journal of Educational Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Philip M. Reeves

20 papers receiving 376 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Philip M. Reeves	278	76	42	33	31	22	392
Robbert Smit	316 1.1×	79 1.0×	25 0.6×	22 0.7×	41 1.3×	29	386
Brenda Brand	359 1.3×	78 1.0×	32 0.8×	64 1.9×	20 0.6×	16	437
Mehmet Fatih Taşar	321 1.2×	112 1.5×	54 1.3×	36 1.1×	41 1.3×	38	378
Patricia D. Morrell	307 1.1×	95 1.3×	35 0.8×	21 0.6×	43 1.4×	31	420
Suzanne Reeve	226 0.8×	108 1.4×	55 1.3×	57 1.7×	39 1.3×	16	401
Dina Tsybulsky	284 1.0×	90 1.2×	33 0.8×	24 0.7×	77 2.5×	35	392
S. Alan Cohen	200 0.7×	137 1.8×	26 0.6×	24 0.7×	16 0.5×	27	393
Louis Rocconi	214 0.8×	48 0.6×	55 1.3×	22 0.7×	15 0.5×	37	335
Emily Nordmann	186 0.7×	93 1.2×	34 0.8×	27 0.8×	14 0.5×	24	393
Susan Rodrigues	345 1.2×	116 1.5×	23 0.5×	34 1.0×	53 1.7×	39	432

Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Reeves

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Reeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Reeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Reeves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Reeves

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Reeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Reeves. The network helps show where Philip M. Reeves may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. Reeves

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. Reeves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. Reeves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. Reeves. Philip M. Reeves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact