Philip M. Reeves
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Information Systems
- Co-authors
- Wik Hung PunKyung Sun ChungRayne A. SperlingD. Jake FollmerSarah ZappeF. J. RobinsonClaudia De GrandiH. Caines
- Topics
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers)Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers)Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaTeaching and Teacher EducationBritish Journal of Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Philip M. Reeves
20 papers receiving 385 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Education 283
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 76
- Social Psychology 44
- Sociology and Political Science 33
- Information Systems 31
Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Reeves
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Reeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Reeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Reeves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Reeves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Reeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Reeves. The network helps show where Philip M. Reeves may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. Reeves
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. Reeves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. Reeves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. Reeves. Philip M. Reeves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 135 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 135 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Philip M. Reeves
Philip M. Reeves is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Family Practice, having authored 22 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers) and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (283 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (15 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (76 citations). Philip M. Reeves has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Wik Hung Pun, Kyung Sun Chung, Rayne A. Sperling, D. Jake Follmer, Sarah Zappe, F. J. Robinson, Claudia De Grandi, H. Caines, Derek Dube and Mark Graham. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Teaching and Teacher Education and British Journal of Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.