Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
20121.9k citationsCorinne A. Moss‐Racusin, John F. Dovidio et al.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesprofile →
Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy
20181.0k citationsAlex J. Wood, Mark Graham et al.profile →
Retinal ischemia: mechanisms of damage and potential therapeutic strategies
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Graham more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Graham. The network helps show where Mark Graham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Graham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Graham.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Graham based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Graham. Mark Graham is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Anwar, Mohammad Amir & Mark Graham. (2020). Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Freedom, Flexibility, Precarity, and Vulnerability in the Gig Economy in Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
Anwar, Mohammad Amir & Mark Graham. (2019). Hidden Transcripts of the Gig Economy: Labour Agency and the New Art of Resistance Among African Gig Workers. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
10.
Anwar, Mohammad Amir & Mark Graham. (2019). Digital Labour at Economic Margins: African Workers and the Global Information Economy. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Graham, Mark & Jamie Woodcock. (2018). Towards a Fairer Platform Economy: Introducing the Fairwork Foundation. Open Research Online (The Open University). 29.66 indexed citations
13.
Wood, Alex J., Vili Lehdonvirta, & Mark Graham. (2018). Workers of the Internet Unite? Online Freelancer Organisation Among Remote Gig Economy Workers in Six Asian and African Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Graham, Mark, et al.. (2017). Engagement in the Knowledge Economy: Regional Patterns of Content Creation with a Focus on Sub-Saharan Africa. Information Technologies and International Development. 13. 19.15 indexed citations
Graham, Mark. (2015). Information Geographies and Geographies of Information. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).5 indexed citations
18.
Poorthuis, Ate, Matthew Zook, Taylor Shelton, Mark Graham, & Monica Stephens. (2014). Using Geotagged Digital Social Data in Geographic Research. SSRN Electronic Journal.16 indexed citations
19.
Viney, N., Mark Graham, Rosanne M. Crooke, Steve Hughes, & W. S. Singleton. (2013). Abstract 14196: Evaluation of Isis Apo(a)Rx, an Antisense Inhibitor to Apolipoprotein(a), in Healthy Volunteers. Circulation. 128.5 indexed citations
20.
Moss‐Racusin, Corinne A., John F. Dovidio, Victoria L. Brescoll, Mark Graham, & Jo Handelsman. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(41). 16474–16479.1927 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.