Philip J. Kitchen
- Marketing top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Don E. SchultzTao LiGayle KerrRod McCollAnastasios PanopoulosLynne EagleSandy BulmerReza Marvi
- Topics
- Marketing and Advertising Strategies (8 papers)Corporate Identity and Reputation (8 papers)Digital Marketing and Social Media (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip J. Kitchen
19 papers receiving 676 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Marketing 396
- Sociology and Political Science 302
- Strategy and Management 193
- Communication 159
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 110
Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Kitchen
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Kitchen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Kitchen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Kitchen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Kitchen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Kitchen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Kitchen. The network helps show where Philip J. Kitchen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip J. Kitchen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip J. Kitchen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip J. Kitchen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip J. Kitchen. Philip J. Kitchen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 59 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 213 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | The Emergence Of IMC: A Theoretical Perspectivebreakdown → | 176 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | Raising the corporate umbrella : corporate communication in the 21st century | 32 |
| 20 | Implications of globalization on customer relationship management | 1 |
About Philip J. Kitchen
Philip J. Kitchen is a scholar working on Marketing, Communication and Strategy and Management, having authored 20 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marketing and Advertising Strategies (8 papers), Corporate Identity and Reputation (8 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (396 citations), Communication (159 citations) and Strategy and Management (193 citations). Philip J. Kitchen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Don E. Schultz, Tao Li, Gayle Kerr, Rod McColl, Anastasios Panopoulos, Lynne Eagle, Sandy Bulmer, Reza Marvi, Tuğra Nazlı Akarsu and Helal Uddin. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Marketing, Journal of Advertising Research and Public Relations Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.