Public Relations Review

2.9k papers and 70.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Public Relations Review in the last decades have received a total of 70.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Public Relations Review usually cover Communication (2.1k papers), Sociology and Political Science (737 papers) and Social Psychology (590 papers) specifically the topics of Public Relations and Crisis Communication (1.9k papers), Media Studies and Communication (663 papers) and Communication in Education and Healthcare (522 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Relations Review are Michael L. Kent, Maureen Taylor, Hugh M. Culbertson, W. Timothy Coombs, William L. Benoit, Linjuan Rita Men, Stephen D. Bruning, James E. Grunig, Frank Winston Wylie and Richard D. Waters.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Public Relations Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Relations Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Relations Review.

Countries where authors publish in Public Relations Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Relations Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Relations Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Relations Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025