Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management9.3k
Replace American Behavioral Scientist with:
American Behavioral ScientistUnited States
Public Opinion QuarterlyUnited States
Communication ResearchUnited States
International Journal of Intercultural RelationsUnited States
Journal of CommunicationUnited States
New Media & SocietyUnited States
British Journal of SociologyUnited Kingdom
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyUnited States
Journalism & Mass Communication QuarterlyUnited States
Organization StudiesUnited Kingdom
American Behavioral ScientistUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Public Relations Review
Public Relations Review · 1×
×0.418.2kCOMMU
×2.167.3kSPS
×0.46.3kSM
×1.215.0kSP
×0.87.9kOBHRM
Citations per year, relative to Public Relations Review
Public Relations Review · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Public Relations Review
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Relations Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Relations Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Relations Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Public Relations Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Relations Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Relations Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.