Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Avery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Avery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Avery more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Avery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Avery. The network helps show where Jill Avery may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill Avery
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill Avery.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill Avery based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jill Avery. Jill Avery is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Avery, Jill, Giana M. Eckhardt, & Michaël Beverland. (2020). Brand Storytelling at Shinola. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School).1 indexed citations
2.
Avery, Jill, et al.. (2015). Denver Museum of Nature & Science.1 indexed citations
3.
Avery, Jill, Chekitan S. Dev, & Peter O’Connor. (2015). Accor: Strengthening the Brand with Digital Marketing.2 indexed citations
4.
Avery, Jill, et al.. (2014). Unlock the Mysteries of Your Customer Relationships. Harvard business review. 92(7). 72–81.18 indexed citations
5.
Paharia, Neeru, Anat Keinan, & Jill Avery. (2014). The upside to large competitors. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 56(1). 7.3 indexed citations
6.
Ofek, Elie, et al.. (2014). Case study second thoughts about a strategy shift. Harvard business review. 92(12). 23.9 indexed citations
Paharia, Neeru, Anat Keinan, Jill Avery, & Juliet B. Schor. (2010). The Underdog Effect: the Marketing of Disadvantage Through Brand Biography. ACR North American Advances.4 indexed citations
15.
Steenburgh, Thomas J. & Jill Avery. (2010). Marketing Analysis Toolkit: Customer Lifetime Value Analysis (CW). SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
16.
Steenburgh, Thomas J. & Jill Avery. (2010). Marketing Analysis Toolkit: Situation Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
17.
Keinan, Anat, Jill Avery, & Neeru Paharia. (2010). Cómo capitalizar el efecto del desaventejado. Harvard business review. 88(10). 14.4 indexed citations
Keinan, Anat, Neeru Paharia, & Jill Avery. (2010). Capitalizing on the Underdog Effect.5 indexed citations
20.
Steenburgh, Thomas J., et al.. (2009). HubSpot: Inbound Marketing and Web 2.0 (TN). SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.