Nieves Baenas
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Food Science top 1%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Diego A. MorenoCristina García‐VigueraRaúl Domínguez‐PerlesAna BarrosA. TeixeiraEduardo RosaNebojša IlićMiona Belović
- Topics
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (24 papers)Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (18 papers)Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
In The Last Decade
Nieves Baenas
52 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Plant Science 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 932
- Biochemistry 900
- Food Science 657
- Nutrition and Dietetics 296
Countries citing papers authored by Nieves Baenas
This map shows the geographic impact of Nieves Baenas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nieves Baenas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nieves Baenas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nieves Baenas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nieves Baenas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nieves Baenas. The network helps show where Nieves Baenas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nieves Baenas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nieves Baenas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nieves Baenas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nieves Baenas. Nieves Baenas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Industrial use of pepper (Capsicum annum L.) derived products: Technological benefits and biological advantagesbreakdown → | 264 |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 70 | |
| 18 | 67 | |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 93 |
About Nieves Baenas
Nieves Baenas is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Toxicology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (24 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (18 papers) and Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (900 citations), Food Science (657 citations) and Plant Science (1.1k citations). Nieves Baenas has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Diego A. Moreno, Cristina García‐Viguera, Raúl Domínguez‐Perles, Ana Barros, A. Teixeira, Eduardo Rosa, Nebojša Ilić, Miona Belović, Anika E. Wagner and Débora Villaño. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.