Nicholas Lytle

522 citations
34 papers · 338 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Lytle

30 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Nicholas Lytle
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Computer Science Applications 297
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 159
  • Software 24
  • Gender Studies 32
  • Information Systems 74
Replace Gabrielė Stupurienė with:
Gabrielė Stupurienė Lithuania
Yihuan Dong United States
Hilarie Nickerson United States
Lennart Rolandsson Sweden
Nataša Grgurina Netherlands
Kathryn M. Rich United States
Raina Mason Australia
İbrahim Çetin Türkiye
Raquel Hijón‐Neira Spain
Mark Dorling United Kingdom
Nicholas Lytle relative to Gabrielė Stupurienė Lithuania Gabrielė Stupurienė's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gabrielė Stupurienė · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Lytle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Lytle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Lytle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Lytle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Lytle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Lytle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Lytle. The network helps show where Nicholas Lytle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Lytle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Lytle Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Lytle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201954
2 201949
3 202033
4 201929
5 201927
6 201823
7 202021
8 201818
9 201913
10 201912
11 20207
12 20197
13
Toward Data-Driven Example Feedback for Novice Programming.
20196
14 20186
15 20206
16 20195
17 20224
18 20233
19 20232
20 20202

About Nicholas Lytle

Nicholas Lytle is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Software, Information Systems and Media Technology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (26 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (11 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (9 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (4 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (4 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (4 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (297 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (159 citations), Software (24 citations), Gender Studies (32 citations) and Information Systems (74 citations). Nicholas Lytle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tiffany Barnes, Veronica Cateté, Yihuan Dong, Thomas Price, Rui Zhi, Robin Jocius, Jennifer Albert, Deepti Joshi, Richard D. Robinson and Samiha Marwan. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, International Journal of Serious Games and Educational Data Mining.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026