Nathan McNeill

449 total citations
19 papers, 297 citations indexed

About

Nathan McNeill is a scholar working on Media Technology, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan McNeill has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 297 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Media Technology, 10 papers in Education and 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nathan McNeill's work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (11 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers). Nathan McNeill is often cited by papers focused on Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (11 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers). Nathan McNeill collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Türkiye. Nathan McNeill's co-authors include Elliot P. Douglas, David J. Therriault, Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg, Christine S. Lee, Monica Cox, Jiabin Zhu, Osman Çekiç, Jeremi London, Qunqun Liu and Chen Bing and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Engineering Education and Qualitative Research.

In The Last Decade

Nathan McNeill

17 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nathan McNeill United States 7 188 128 59 54 30 19 297
Irene Mena United States 7 174 0.9× 66 0.5× 126 2.1× 52 1.0× 30 1.0× 26 304
Anita Patrick United States 10 110 0.6× 107 0.8× 27 0.5× 19 0.4× 42 1.4× 19 270
Lari Garrison United States 5 173 0.9× 210 1.6× 54 0.9× 38 0.7× 61 2.0× 8 395
Jennifer Kersten United States 4 292 1.6× 90 0.7× 112 1.9× 58 1.1× 44 1.5× 7 448
Jenny Daugherty United States 11 228 1.2× 94 0.7× 74 1.3× 54 1.0× 27 0.9× 36 366
Amy Wilson‐Lopez United States 11 167 0.9× 89 0.7× 56 0.9× 26 0.5× 23 0.8× 31 296
Natalie Tran United States 9 191 1.0× 69 0.5× 72 1.2× 15 0.3× 19 0.6× 21 319
Tamara Knott United States 7 159 0.8× 143 1.1× 43 0.7× 39 0.7× 52 1.7× 23 401
Rebekah Hammack United States 9 212 1.1× 54 0.4× 97 1.6× 44 0.8× 28 0.9× 32 299
Birdy Reynolds United States 5 206 1.1× 69 0.5× 86 1.5× 48 0.9× 42 1.4× 7 324

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan McNeill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan McNeill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan McNeill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan McNeill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan McNeill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan McNeill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan McNeill. The network helps show where Nathan McNeill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan McNeill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan McNeill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan McNeill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan McNeill. Nathan McNeill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Douglas, Elliot P., et al.. (2020). Moving Beyond Formulas and Fixations: Exploring Approaches to Solving Open-Ended Engineering Problems. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 22.1084.1–22.1084.21. 2 indexed citations
2.
McNeill, Nathan & Monica Cox. (2020). Global Engineering Programs: Identifying and Supporting a Diverse Array of Learning Outcomes. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 22.749.1–22.749.19.
3.
Bairaktarova, Diana, et al.. (2020). Challenging Students' Values and Assumptions Through Project-Based Learning. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 24.269.1–24.269.15.
4.
Douglas, Elliot P., Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg, David J. Therriault, Christine M. Lee, & Nathan McNeill. (2020). Discourses and Social Worlds in Engineering Education: Preparing Problem-solvers for Engineering Practice. 25.471.1–25.471.15. 2 indexed citations
6.
McNeill, Nathan, Elliot P. Douglas, Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg, & David J. Therriault. (2020). Institutional Discourses in Engineering Education and Practice. 25.786.1–25.786.15. 1 indexed citations
7.
Cox, Monica, et al.. (2020). Developing A Global Real Time Assessment Tool For The Teaching Enhancement Of Engineering Graduate Teaching Assistants. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 15.375.1–15.375.8. 4 indexed citations
8.
Therriault, David J., Christine M. Lee, Elliot P. Douglas, Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg, & Nathan McNeill. (2020). Open-Book Problem-Solving in Engineering: An Exploratory Study. 22.1123.1–22.1123.13. 2 indexed citations
9.
Zhu, Jiabin, Juebei Chen, Nathan McNeill, et al.. (2018). Mapping Engineering Students’ Learning Outcomes From International Experiences: Designing an Instrument to Measure Attainment of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes. IEEE Transactions on Education. 62(2). 108–118. 11 indexed citations
10.
Koro‐Ljungberg, Mirka, et al.. (2017). Academic Problem-Solving and Students’ identities as engineers. The Qualitative Report. 6 indexed citations
11.
McNeill, Nathan, et al.. (2016). Undergraduate Students' Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving. Journal of Engineering Education. 105(4). 560–584. 86 indexed citations
12.
Lee, Christine S., Nathan McNeill, Elliot P. Douglas, Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg, & David J. Therriault. (2013). Indispensable Resource? A Phenomenological Study of Textbook Use in Engineering Problem Solving. Journal of Engineering Education. 102(2). 269–288. 41 indexed citations
13.
Koro‐Ljungberg, Mirka, et al.. (2012). Reconceptualizing and decentering think-aloud methodology in qualitative research. Qualitative Research. 13(6). 735–753. 47 indexed citations
14.
Douglas, Elliot P., et al.. (2012). Moving beyond formulas and fixations: solving open-ended engineering problems. European Journal of Engineering Education. 37(6). 627–651. 61 indexed citations
15.
Cox, Monica, et al.. (2011). Enhancing the Quality of Engineering Graduate Teaching Assistants through Multidimensional Feedback. AEE Journal. 2(3). 21 indexed citations
16.
Douglas, Elliot P., Nathan McNeill, Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg, & David J. Therriault. (2011). Dealing with ambiguity in open-ended engineering problems. 850–858. 1 indexed citations
17.
Douglas, Elliot P., et al.. (2011). Work in progress — The role of working memory and epistemic beliefs on open-ended problem solving. 17. S4B–1. 2 indexed citations
18.
Cox, Monica, et al.. (2011). Assessing the Pedagogical Impact of the VaNTH Engineering Research Center on Faculty and Postdoctoral Professionals. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(2). 2 indexed citations
19.
McNeill, Nathan. (2010). Global engineering education programs: More than just international experiences. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026