Nadia Kellam

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
86 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Nadia Kellam is a scholar working on Media Technology, Education and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia Kellam has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Media Technology, 33 papers in Education and 13 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Nadia Kellam's work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (33 papers), Career Development and Diversity (13 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (13 papers). Nadia Kellam is often cited by papers focused on Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (33 papers), Career Development and Diversity (13 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (13 papers). Nadia Kellam collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ethiopia. Nadia Kellam's co-authors include Joachim Walther, Nicola W. Sochacka, Tracie Costantino, Kelly W. Guyotte, David Radcliffe, Bonnie Cramond, David K. Gattie, Alice Pawley, Lisa Benson and Todd R. Kelley and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Ecological Modelling and Journal of Engineering Education.

In The Last Decade

Nadia Kellam

73 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: R... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nadia Kellam United States 15 546 390 200 146 146 86 1.2k
Nicola W. Sochacka United States 17 608 1.1× 425 1.1× 209 1.0× 148 1.0× 216 1.5× 49 1.3k
Lisa McNair United States 14 407 0.7× 389 1.0× 133 0.7× 134 0.9× 185 1.3× 115 1.0k
Joachim Walther United States 20 843 1.5× 619 1.6× 249 1.2× 272 1.9× 277 1.9× 83 1.8k
Kacey Beddoes United States 18 480 0.9× 520 1.3× 291 1.5× 92 0.6× 200 1.4× 76 1.2k
Jon A. Leydens United States 20 587 1.1× 594 1.5× 175 0.9× 146 1.0× 234 1.6× 48 1.3k
Demetra Evangelou United States 14 431 0.8× 180 0.5× 144 0.7× 95 0.7× 92 0.6× 42 794
Ruth Streveler United States 16 853 1.6× 776 2.0× 278 1.4× 122 0.8× 201 1.4× 118 1.5k
Adam Carberry United States 16 618 1.1× 501 1.3× 113 0.6× 260 1.8× 224 1.5× 127 1.3k
Brenda Capobianco United States 22 1000 1.8× 266 0.7× 345 1.7× 187 1.3× 113 0.8× 72 1.4k
Brent Jesiek United States 17 764 1.4× 843 2.2× 152 0.8× 116 0.8× 233 1.6× 132 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Kellam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Kellam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Kellam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Kellam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Kellam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Kellam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Kellam. The network helps show where Nadia Kellam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Kellam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Kellam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Kellam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Kellam. Nadia Kellam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kellam, Nadia, et al.. (2024). Powerful Change Attends to Power Relations. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings.
2.
Kellam, Nadia, et al.. (2024). Black Men in the Making: Engaging in Maker Spaces Promotes Agency and Identity for Black Males in Engineering. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 2 indexed citations
3.
Kellam, Nadia, et al.. (2024). Understanding the Perspectives of Empathy Among Engineering Faculty Members. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. 3 indexed citations
5.
Lee, Eunsil, Jennifer Bekki, Adam Carberry, & Nadia Kellam. (2024). Understanding International Engineering Doctoral Students’ Sense of Belonging Through Their Interpersonal Interactions in the Academic Community. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 3 indexed citations
7.
Walther, Joachim, Shari E. Miller, & Nadia Kellam. (2020). Exploring the Role of Empathy in Engineering Communication through a Transdisciplinary Dialogue. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 25.622.1–25.622.11. 26 indexed citations
8.
McKenna, Ann, Jennifer Bekki, Samantha Brunhaver, et al.. (2020). Board 100: Progress on the Pathway to Instigating a Revolution of Additive Innovation.
9.
Pawley, Alice, Adam Carberry, Monica Cardella, et al.. (2020). The PEER Collaborative: Supporting Engineering Education Research Faculty with Near-peer Mentoring Unconference Workshops. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 24.1237.1–24.1237.19. 5 indexed citations
10.
Kellam, Nadia, et al.. (2020). Board 71: Making a New Path: Lessons Learned During the 'Making the Data' Phase of our Project. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education).
11.
Huff, James, Johanna Lönngren, Tom Adawi, Nadia Kellam, & Idalis Villanueva. (2020). Special Session: Emotions in Engineering Education – A Roadmap to Possibilities in Research and Practice. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 21. 1–3. 2 indexed citations
12.
Kellam, Nadia, et al.. (2020). Teaching Journeys of Engineering Faculty: Stories of Transition. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 23.1145.1–23.1145.9.
13.
McKenna, Ann, Jennifer Bekki, Samantha Brunhaver, et al.. (2018). Progress on the pathway to instigating a revolution of additive innovation. 1 indexed citations
14.
Kellam, Nadia, et al.. (2018). Exploring emotional trajectories of engineering students: a narrative research approach. 34(6). 1726–1740. 25 indexed citations
15.
Kellam, Nadia, et al.. (2017). Connected ways of knowing: Uncovering the role of emotion in engineering student learning. 2 indexed citations
16.
Walther, Joachim, et al.. (2017). Qualitative Research Quality: A Collaborative Inquiry Across Multiple Methodological Perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education. 106(3). 398–430. 85 indexed citations
17.
Walther, Joachim, et al.. (2011). Emotional indicators as a way to elicit authentic student reflection in engineering programs. 7 indexed citations
18.
Kellam, Nadia, Joachim Walther, Tracie Costantino, & Bonnie Cramond. (2010). Integrating the environmental engineering curriculum through crossdisciplinary studios. 5 indexed citations
19.
Walther, Joachim, Nadia Kellam, Tracie Costantino, & Bonnie Cramond. (2010). Integrative learning in a Synthesis and Design Studio: A phenomenological inquiry. 63. S2F–1. 5 indexed citations
20.
Kellam, Nadia, David K. Gattie, & Caner Kazancı. (2007). A network model of distributed and centralized systems of students. Proceedings/Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference. 7. F4G–3. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026