Merilee McCurdy

867 total citations
29 papers, 409 citations indexed

About

Merilee McCurdy is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Merilee McCurdy has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 409 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 14 papers in Education and 8 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Merilee McCurdy's work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (17 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (12 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers). Merilee McCurdy is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral and Psychological Studies (17 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (12 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers). Merilee McCurdy collaborates with scholars based in United States. Merilee McCurdy's co-authors include Edward J. Daly, Christopher H. Skinner, Valerie Gortmaker, Michael Persampieri, T. Steuart Watson, Susan M. Sheridan, Katrina N Rhymer, Stephanie K. Daniels, Dennis Ciancio and Gary L. Cates and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, School Psychology Review and Psychology in the Schools.

In The Last Decade

Merilee McCurdy

25 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Merilee McCurdy United States 13 330 183 129 99 89 29 409
J Resetár United States 5 400 1.2× 199 1.1× 65 0.5× 132 1.3× 149 1.7× 6 478
Katharina Galuschka Germany 8 329 1.0× 196 1.1× 101 0.8× 81 0.8× 78 0.9× 11 460
Kashunda L. Williams United States 6 393 1.2× 198 1.1× 55 0.4× 127 1.3× 161 1.8× 7 487
Garrett J. Roberts United States 15 415 1.3× 210 1.1× 143 1.1× 88 0.9× 45 0.5× 34 496
Katherine F. Wickstrom United States 7 365 1.1× 111 0.6× 71 0.6× 115 1.2× 184 2.1× 7 430
Gary L. Cates United States 13 399 1.2× 175 1.0× 244 1.9× 111 1.1× 54 0.6× 23 527
Caryl H. Hitchcock United States 7 252 0.8× 156 0.9× 54 0.4× 125 1.3× 68 0.8× 10 420
W. David Tilly United States 9 447 1.4× 220 1.2× 154 1.2× 45 0.5× 107 1.2× 10 510
Maggie Coleman United States 8 289 0.9× 167 0.9× 84 0.7× 68 0.7× 69 0.8× 12 374
Sheila R. Alber United States 13 298 0.9× 200 1.1× 34 0.3× 86 0.9× 53 0.6× 27 413

Countries citing papers authored by Merilee McCurdy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Merilee McCurdy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Merilee McCurdy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Merilee McCurdy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Merilee McCurdy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Merilee McCurdy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Merilee McCurdy. The network helps show where Merilee McCurdy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Merilee McCurdy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Merilee McCurdy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Merilee McCurdy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Merilee McCurdy. Merilee McCurdy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Skinner, Christopher H., et al.. (2023). Evaluating the effects of the color wheel system on a teacher’s repeated directions.. School Psychology. 40(1). 56–64.
3.
Wright, S. Paul, Christopher H. Skinner, Tara L. Moore, et al.. (2022). Using a Tootling intervention to sequentially enhance and maintain at-risk elementary students’ performance of multiple social skills.. School Psychology. 37(3). 248–258. 4 indexed citations
4.
McCallum, R. Steve, et al.. (2022). Using a one-minute screener to identify students at risk for academic difficulties. Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 67(1). 58–67.
5.
Skinner, Christopher H., Dennis Ciancio, Stephanie K. Daniels, et al.. (2020). Effects of unfamiliar diverse names on elementary students’ passage comprehension.. School Psychology. 35(3). 215–225. 2 indexed citations
7.
Skinner, Christopher H., et al.. (2019). Comparing Computer-Based Sight-Word Interventions in Students with Intellectual Disability: Self-Determined Versus Fixed Response Intervals. Journal of Behavioral Education. 29(3). 469–489. 3 indexed citations
8.
McCurdy, Merilee, et al.. (2019). Bonus rewards for everyone: Enhancing mathematics performance with supplemental interdependent group contingencies. Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 64(1). 77–88. 11 indexed citations
10.
Skinner, Christopher H., et al.. (2016). Cumulative Instructional Time and Relative Effectiveness Conclusions: Extending Research on Response Intervals, Learning, and Measurement Scale. Behavior Analysis in Practice. 9(1). 58–62. 15 indexed citations
11.
Skinner, Christopher H., et al.. (2016). Evaluating a computer flash-card sight-word recognition intervention with self-determined response intervals in elementary students with intellectual disability.. School Psychology Quarterly. 32(3). 367–378. 15 indexed citations
12.
Skinner, Amy, et al.. (2016). Extending Research on a Computer-Based Flashcard Reading Intervention to Postsecondary Students with Intellectual Disabilities.. 10(2). 191–206. 7 indexed citations
13.
McCurdy, Merilee, et al.. (2016). Identifying Effective Spelling Interventions Using a Brief Experimental Analysis and Extended Analysis. Journal of Applied School Psychology. 32(1). 46–65. 6 indexed citations
14.
15.
Gortmaker, Valerie, et al.. (2007). IMPROVING READING OUTCOMES FOR CHILDREN WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES: USING BRIEF EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS TO DEVELOP PARENT‐TUTORING INTERVENTIONS. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 40(2). 203–221. 54 indexed citations
16.
McCurdy, Merilee, et al.. (2006). Use of Brief Instructional Trials to Identify Small Group Reading Strategies: A Two Experiment Study. Journal of Behavioral Education. 16(1). 7–26. 16 indexed citations
17.
Persampieri, Michael, Valerie Gortmaker, Edward J. Daly, Susan M. Sheridan, & Merilee McCurdy. (2006). Promoting parent use of empirically supported reading interventions: two experimental investigations of child outcomes. Behavioral Interventions. 21(1). 31–57. 36 indexed citations
18.
Daly, Edward J. & Merilee McCurdy. (2002). Getting It Right So They Can Get It Right: An Overview of the Special Series. School Psychology Review. 31(4). 453–458. 19 indexed citations
19.
McCurdy, Merilee, et al.. (2001). Increasing On-Task Behavior in an Elementary Student During Mathematics Seatwork by Interspersing Additional Brief Problems. School Psychology Review. 30(1). 23–32. 52 indexed citations
20.
Cates, Gary L., et al.. (1999). Effects of Interspersing Additional Brief Math Problems on Student Performance and Perception of Math Assignments: Getting Students to Prefer to Do More Work. Journal of Behavioral Education. 9(3-4). 177–192. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026