Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Adjusted P-Values for Simultaneous Inference
1992820 citationsS. Paul WrightBiometricsprofile →
Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation
1997614 citationsWilliam L. Sanders, S. Paul Wright et al.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by S. Paul Wright
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of S. Paul Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Paul Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Paul Wright more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Paul Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Paul Wright. The network helps show where S. Paul Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Paul Wright
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Paul Wright.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Paul Wright based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with S. Paul Wright. S. Paul Wright is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wright, S. Paul, et al.. (2010). Measurement of Academic Growth of Individual Students toward Variable and Meaningful Academic Standards1.14 indexed citations
9.
Sanders, William L., et al.. (2009). Addressing Common Concerns About Value-Added Modeling.1 indexed citations
10.
Sanders, William L., et al.. (2009). A Response to Criticisms of SAS® EVAAS®.11 indexed citations
11.
Sanders, William L., et al.. (2008). Do Teacher Effect Estimates Persist when Teachers Move to Schools with Different Socioeconomic Environments? Working Paper 2008-20..1 indexed citations
12.
Sanders, William L., James J. Ashton, & S. Paul Wright. (2005). Comparison of the Effects of NBPTS Certified Teachers with Other Teachers on the Rate of Student Academic Progress. Final Report..24 indexed citations
13.
Ross, Steven M., et al.. (2001). Fourth-Year Achievement Results on the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System for Restructuring Schools in Memphis..6 indexed citations
Ross, Steven M., William L. Sanders, & S. Paul Wright. (2000). Value-Added Achievement Results for Two Cohorts of Co-NECT Schools in Memphis: 1995-1999 Outcomes.2 indexed citations
16.
Ross, Steven M., et al.. (2000). Value-Added Achievement Results for Three Cohorts of Roots and Wings Schools in Memphis: 1995-1999 Outcomes.4 indexed citations
17.
Sanders, William L., et al.. (1997). Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education. 11(1). 57–67.614 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Westfall, Peter H., S. Stanley Young, & S. Paul Wright. (1993). On Adjusting P-Values for Multiplicity. Biometrics. 49(3). 941–941.109 indexed citations
Wright, S. Paul. (1992). Adjusted P-Values for Simultaneous Inference. Biometrics. 48(4). 1005–1005.820 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.