Psychology in the Schools

4.8k papers and 75.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.8k papers published in Psychology in the Schools in the last decades have received a total of 75.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychology in the Schools usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.1k papers), Education (1.9k papers) and Clinical Psychology (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1.2k papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (963 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (890 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychology in the Schools are Sharon Bradley‐Johnson, Carol Goodenow, Susan A. Sullivan, E. Scott Huebner, Gilbert R. Gredler, Michael J. Furlong, Christine K. Malecki, Sandra L. Christenson, James J. Appleton and Georgiana Shick Tryon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychology in the Schools

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychology in the Schools. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychology in the Schools.

Countries where authors publish in Psychology in the Schools

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychology in the Schools. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychology in the Schools with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychology in the Schools more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025