This map shows the geographic impact of Mehmet Bahar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mehmet Bahar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mehmet Bahar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mehmet Bahar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mehmet Bahar. The network helps show where Mehmet Bahar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mehmet Bahar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mehmet Bahar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mehmet Bahar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mehmet Bahar. Mehmet Bahar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bahar, Mehmet. (2019). Kırsal Kalkınma Kapsamında Coğrafi İşaretli Ürünlerin Önemi: Yeşilova (Salda) Bölgesine Özgü Ürünler Örneği. 9(1). 1–7.1 indexed citations
4.
Gürer, Meli̇h Derya, et al.. (2017). ICT Education in Turkey: National ICT Curriculum to Improve Teaching and Learning. CeON Repository (Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science).
5.
Bahar, Mehmet. (2014). The effect of instructional methods on the performance of the students having different cognitive styles. DergiPark (Istanbul University).9 indexed citations
Erdoğan, Mehmet, Mehmet Bahar, & Muhammet Uşak. (2012). Environmental Education in High School 9th-12th Biology Course Curricula Started to Be Implemented in 2007.. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice. 12(3). 2230–2235.5 indexed citations
8.
Erdoğan, Mehmet, Mehmet Bahar, & Muhammet Uşak. (2012). 2007 Yılında uygulanmaya başlanan lise 9-12. sınıf biyoloji dersi öğretim programlarında çevre eğitimi. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice. 12(3). 2217–2235.1 indexed citations
Bahar, Mehmet. (2009). The Relationships between Pupils' Learning Styles and Their Performance in Mini Science Projects.. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice. 9(1). 31–49.8 indexed citations
11.
Bahar, Mehmet. (2009). Öğrencilerin Öğrenme Stilleri ve Mini Fen Proje Çalışmalarındaki Performansları Arasındaki İlişki. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice. 9(1). 7–52.2 indexed citations
Bahar, Mehmet, Murat Özel, Pavol Prokop, & Muhammet Uşak. (2008). SCIENCE STUDENT TEACHERS’ IDEAS OF THE HEART. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 7(2).39 indexed citations
14.
Bahar, Mehmet, et al.. (2007). The Science Topics Perceived Difficult by Pupils at Primary 6-8 Classes: Diagnosing the Problems and Remedy Suggestions.. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice. 7(3). 1113–1129.13 indexed citations
15.
Bahar, Mehmet. (2003). A Study of Pupils' Ideas About the Concept of Life. 11(1). 93–104.8 indexed citations
16.
Bahar, Mehmet, et al.. (2003). Kelime İletişim Test Yöntemi İle Lise 1. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Canlıların Temel Bileşenleri Konusundaki Bilişsel Yapılarının Araştırılması. DergiPark (Istanbul University).40 indexed citations
17.
Bahar, Mehmet. (2002). Students' Learning Difficulties in Biology: Reasons and Solutions. 10(1). 73–82.14 indexed citations
18.
Bahar, Mehmet. (2002). A Factor Effecting Students' Performance in Biology: Working Memory Capacity. Turkish Education Association - Journal of Education and Science. 27(125). 49–53.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.